考量延誤成本之跑道整建策略—以桃園國際機場為例

Runway Reconstruction Strategies Determined by Delay Cost—Take Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport for Example

鄭羽哲(Yu-che Cheng)

指導教授 ： 周家蓓

國立臺灣大學/工學院/土木工程學研究所/碩士(2007年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2007.02777

摘要

機場鋪面管理系統（APMS）已成為國際先進機場之鋪面道面管理輔助決策工具，透過鋪面破壞現況指標（PCI）與其他鋪面參考指標輔助，現有的APMS已能提供高度可信之養護與維修參考決策。而對於全世界之主要國際機場而言，自波音747問世以來所設計之跑道鋪面，至今多半已達到設計壽齡，也需重新進行全面性整建或養護之相關評估。機場道面之養護或整建，對於機場營運皆會產生程度不一之延誤，但機場鋪面之養護決策時常無法與機場營運相關因素配合，使得於養護面較佳之整建策略，未必對於機場運作最為有利。另外，不同之養護策略又將搭配不同之養護工作日，也將對機場運作造成一定程度之衝擊。在航空燃油成本居高不下之下，考量機場營運作業之養護或整建決策已成為未來發展之主流方向。

本研究乃針對雙跑道機場，考量鋪面整建與養護成本，以及不同期程內工程作業造成之航機延誤成本。針對機場跑道自整建後設計生命週期內，以固定頻率與鋪面破壞率形成兩養護策略，先評估不同策略下之鋪面生命週期成本，再搭配不同整建與養護策略所產生之航機延誤量，進而轉為航機延誤成本，並以淨現值與益本比等經濟分析方法進行評估。期藉由實證之方式，以台灣桃園國際機場為研究對象，引入其相關數值後，映證引入延誤成本之跑道整建策略為一可行且更具未來性之跑道整建評估方式。

關鍵字

機場鋪面管理系統 ； 鋪面整建策略 ； 鋪面生命週期成本 ； 航機延誤成本

並列摘要

Airport Pavement Management System (APMS) has been a useful tool for pavement management decision making. Moreover, existing APMS is capable of providing high reliable maintenance strategies by using pavement condition index (PCI) and other performance indices. Nowadays, most runway pavements in major international airports, designed for sustaining Boeing 747, are not only close to design life but also under maintenance and reconstruction (M&R) considerations. Different M&R strategies would make different levels of delay impacts on airport operations. Sometimes, M&R strategies couldn’t cooperate with airport operations, and the best strategies for pavement maintenance may have the negative effect on usual operations. Therefore, in this high oil price age, considering the delay impacts of different airport M&R strategies on airport operations becomes an important task.

This study evaluates different M&R strategies, which are applied at parallel runway airports in which only single runway is in maintenance. In addition, this study considers pavement M&R costs as well as aircraft delay costs induced by different M&R strategies and periods. The life cycle cost (LCC) of runway pavements after M&R measures is estimated based on two maintenance frequency considerations, i.e. fixed maintenance frequency and fixed PCI decreasing, and LCC of different M&R strategies are evaluated by comparing net price values (NPV) and benefit-cost ratios (B/C ratio). Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport is studied for demonstrating. The concept of taking aircraft delay cost into consideration when choosing M&R strategies is proved to be a feasible and innovative evaluation method.

並列關鍵字

Airport Pavement Management System (APMS) ； reconstruction and maintenance (M&R) strategy ； pavement life cycle cost (LCC) ； delay cost

參考文獻

31. 江東曉，「機場跑滑道停機坪維護成本分析」，國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文，民國九十五年

15. Yuan, Jie (Fugro South, Inc.); Mooney, Michael A., “Development of Adaptive Performance Models for Oklahoma Airfield Pavement Management System”, Transportation Research Record, n 1853, 2003, p 44-54

21. FAA, ”Airport Capacity and Delay (AC 150/5060-5)”, 1983.

23. 戴佐敏、劉仲祥、李昀諭(民93)，「機場模擬模式之建立與跑道容量分析」，運輸計畫季刊，第三十三卷，第三期，頁471-510。

24. Bielli, M., Calicchio, G., Nicoletti, B. asnd Ricciardelli, S., “The Air Traffic Flow Control Problem as an Application of Network Theory”, Computer and Ops. Res. Vol.9 No.4, pp.265-278, 1982.