集合住宅社區型態與社區活動關係之研究--以台北縣汐止市為例

The study of the relationship between condominium's types and community activities--the case of Hshichi City, Taipei County

黃耀群(Yao-Cheng Hwang)

指導教授 ： 張長義

國立臺灣大學/理學院/地理環境資源學研究所/碩士(2007年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2007.03355

摘要

台灣近年集合住宅社區的發展，有大型化、高層化的趨勢，並且產生多樣化的社區型態，社區內的公共空間與設施也有多樣化的趨勢，傳統上認為集合住宅社區的社區型態不利於社區意識的發展，因此不容易推動社區活動，由於集合住宅具有共有共用的特性，少數人缺乏社區意識，常會造成社區經營管理的困擾，降低社區生活品質，故集合住宅相當需要培養社區意識，一般認為社區居民參與社區活動有利於社區意識，因此集合住宅是否能突破住宅型態的限制而舉辦社區活動，有哪些因素影響集合住宅社區活動，為本研究關切的主題。
台北縣汐止市在1980-90年代經歷大規模的開發，有許多的集合住宅社區，相當能反映過去十幾年來台灣集合住宅的發展，同時由於汐止的人口大都由外地遷入，對當地缺乏認同，因此透過社區活動讓居民融入在地生活，可說相當切合地方之需要。
本研究從管理者認知的觀點，針對汐止地區有管理者的集合住宅社區進行調查，將社區分為公寓、大廈、高層大廈、透天厝四類，並探討汐止為特色的山坡地社區與非山坡地社區之差異，和其他社區型態變數間的關係，以呈現汐止集合住宅社區之形貌。
本研究於2007年五至六月，以問卷調查方式進行抽樣調查，共獲得58個有效樣本，調查內容包括社區之管理模式、社區對管理事務重要性的認知、社區擁有的公共設施、社區活動的頻率、社區不常舉辦活動之原因、管理者對社區活動之認知、及社區型態變數等，並假設社區型態、管理模式、設施個數會影響活動頻率。
研究結果發現三點研究假設均未成立，住宅型態與山坡地社區對於解釋社區活動頻率差異都不是很理想的變數，管理模式、設施個數對活動頻率也沒有明顯影響。

關鍵字

集合住宅型態 ； 社區活動 ； 公共空間設施 ； 汐止

並列摘要

There are trends that the condominium in Taiwan are getting broader and higher, and the types are various, too. The public space in communities are also various. Traditionally, the condominium’s types are considered ill to the development of the sense of community, prevent to raise the community activities. Because the condominium are co-used and co-owned by the residents, the lack of sense of community will produce problems of the management of communities and destroy the quality of life. So sense of community is quite important to condominium. That the residents attend the community activities are considered good to sense of community, so the theme of the study is that if condominium could raise community activities, and what kind of factors will affect the activities.
Hshichi City in 1980s and 1990s ever launched large-scale development, and there are many condominiums. They can reflect the development of condominium in Taiwan in recent years. And most people in Hshichi moved from outside, they don’t have sense of identity, so the community activities do match the needs of the people.
The study investigated the manager’s point of view, the targets are the condominium with managers, and discuss the difference between communities on hillside and communities not on hillside, and the relationship between condominium’s types and other variables.
The study do the fieldwork in May and June in 2007, and do the survey by questionnaire. The study got 58 samples, the content of the survey include the model of management, perception of the affairs’ importance, the public space and facilities in condominium, the frequency of activities, the reason why they don’t raise activities, the perception to community activities, and other variables. The research also makes three assumptions: the condominium’s types, the management model and the count of the facilities will influence the frequency of community activities.
The study finally found out: the three assumptions were not proved. The condominium’s types and the hillside’s communities are not very good variables to explain the difference in frequency of activities. And the management model and the count of the facilities don’t have obvious relation to activities, either.

並列關鍵字

community activity ； public space and facilities ； Hshichi

參考文獻

陳東升（1995）金權城市，台北：巨流。

李秀玲（2006）社區意識與社區休閒活動參與關係之研究－以台中市Q社區為例，靜宜大學觀光事業學系碩士論文。

洪子茵（2002）台北式集合住宅管理維護模式之研究，政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。

洪幸妙、張金鶚（1993）住宅管理維護對住宅品質之影響研究，都市與計劃，20(1): 1-22。

Altman, I. (1975) The environment and social behavior: privacy, person space, territory, crowding, California: Brooks/Cole.