台灣政黨輪替後大陸政策變遷之研究（2000∼2006年）

The Research of Mainland China Policy after Political Party Change on Taiwan（2000∼2006）

沙鵬(Peng Sha)

指導教授 ： 張五岳

淡江大學/國際研究學院/中國大陸研究所碩士在職專班/碩士(2007年)

https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2007.00004

摘要

2000年因為政黨輪替，由民進黨取代了長期執政的國民黨，由於意識形態的不同，造成大陸政策必然有所改變，但當時陳水扁總統初掌國政，權力基礎並未鞏固，為求穩定，大體走的是中間路線，對兩岸關係也確實想釋出善意，從最初的「四不一沒有」、「兩岸統合論」、「積極開放、有效管理」等可見一斑，但中共卻堅持「一國兩制」的模式，將台灣打壓或矮化為地方政府，這對二千三百萬的台灣人民是決然不可能接受的選項，因此在久等不耐之下，陳總統忽然在2002年拋出「一邊一國論」，讓中共自此更為明確的認定民進黨政府的台獨走向，也斷絕了兩岸之間一切溝通管道。2004年，陳水扁在極大爭議下當選連任，由於已無繼續連任的壓力，大陸政策傾向緊縮，致力於「本土化」及「去中國化」；中共也在2005年3月14日通過「反分裂國家法」，在法律的基礎上明定兩岸本為一體，決然不可分割，同時宣示以非和平手段對抗台獨的決心，並在國際間廣為宣傳，使台灣獨立建國之路更加顯得邈茫。陳總統處於這種「統」之不可行，「獨」又不可能的兩難局面，一直無法突破，也倍受國人爭議，再加上想要挽回其因為內政之不修、經濟之不振與弊案之不斷所造成的危機，終於在2006年元旦文告上提出「積極管理、有效開放」之大陸政策調整，並在稍後之2月28日，正式中止國統會與國統綱領，等於明確的昭告中共與世界各國，台灣決定開始走自己的路，朝向建立一個獨立自主而嶄新的國家，但在中共的強力打壓及國際間不見支持下，必須找出妥善的因應之道，使二千三百萬同胞及其後代子孫都能免除戰爭的威脅，朝向和平共生、互惠雙贏、自然融合的目標邁進。

關鍵字

台灣 ； 中國 ； 政黨輪替 ； 大陸政策 ； 兩岸關係 ； 一國兩制

並列摘要

In 2000, because of the political party change, Democratic Progressive Party substituted for the long-term ruling Kuomintang. As a result of the ideological differences, the Mainland China Policy had to be changed inevitably. At the beginning of President Chen Shui-bian’s rule, his power in control of the state was not so strong. For stability, He chose the middle-of-the-road line, and truly wanted to send the good will to Mainland China for cross-strait relations. He then submitted “Four Nos and One Without”, “Both Sides Integration Theory”, “Positive Opening, Effective Management” and so on. Since China persisted in the principle “one country, two systems”, Taiwan would actually be pressed or lowered to be a local authority. This was absolutely impossible for 23,000,000 Taiwanese people to accept as an option. After waiting for a long time and getting nothing satisfied, President Chen could bear no more. He suddenly presented “One Country on Each Side of The Strait Theory” in 2002. From that occasion, China explicitly recognized that Democratic Progressive Party Government was indeed the hardcore of Taiwan independence trend, and then broke any official communication channel between both sides. In 2004, Chen Shui-bian was reelected the president under an enormous dispute. Because he had no longer had the pressure of reelection, he then tightened up the Mainland China Policy, devoted to “the localization” and “the de-Chinalization”. The Chinese Communist Party Government also passed “The Anti-cessation Law” on March 14, 2005. It was stipulated that both sides of the Strait were actually a complete body in a legal foundation and could never be separated. In the meantime, China even declared the resolution of counter Taiwan-independence by non-peace methods. This slogan was also widespread internationally. That caused “Taiwan Independence” even harder to achieve. President Chen was then in a dilemma which both “unification” and “independence” were impossible to act. Being unable to break through the cross-strait relations in a long run, he was widely disputed by the people on Taiwan. In order to resolve his political crisis on worse internal affairs and the economy as well as continuous corruption scandals, he finally proposed a Mainland China Policy adjustment, “positive management, effective opening” on New Year's Day in 2006. Later on February 28, he officially ceased the function of “The National Unification Council” and ceased the application of “The National Unification Guidelines “. It was equal to clearly informing China and the other countries in the world that Taiwan decided to start walking its own way and headed to establish an independent as well as a brand-new country. However, under the pressure of China forces and without international supports, we surely must find some proper measures to deal with all the struggles ahead. Let our 23,000,000 compatriots on Taiwan and their descendants no longer be threatened by wars. In the end, people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait can all live in peace and mutual-understanding. They will cooperate with each other and get a win-win game. Furthermore, they might also make great strides forward to the goal of natural fusion in the future.

並列關鍵字

Taiwan ； China ； Political Party Change ； Mainland China Policy ； Cross-strait Relations ； One Country Two Systems

參考文獻

4. 王銘義，對話與對抗─台灣與中國的政治較量（台北：天下遠見公司，2005年1月）。

46. 張亞中，全球化與兩岸統合（台北：聯經出版公司，2003年4月）。

1. 李銘義，「九二共識與一個中國議題之研析」（共黨問題研究，2001年6月號，2001年6月）。

18. 魏艾，「經濟全球化下的兩岸經貿關係」（問題與展望，第二屆兩岸遠景論壇，2002年）。

5. 財團法人國家政策研究基金會，網址: http://www.npf.org.tw