淡水國小校舍改建的配置策略

1999年九月二一日，當時，發生芮氏規模7.3的地震撼動全臺灣，造成許多校舍受損，淡水國小也為其中之一。至2012年間，淡水國小經歷長達13年之校園改造。今日，淡水國小將面臨海砂屋校舍拆除而展開下個階段的重建。吳惠花校長希望能藉此機會，對未來的淡水國小進行校園規劃。本研究以「淡水國小校園規劃」作為研究。先透過文獻，探討學齡兒童發展，和教改、開放教育對於教育空間的影響，以及震後的新校園運動的回顧；後使用田野調查，觀察淡水國小目前使用之現況分析，並列出未來進行規劃時，需要回應之觀點。總結後提出三項規劃替選方案，供淡水國小進行校園規劃時之參考。總結文獻、議題及提案後，對校方和規劃者有下列建議: 1.以學童的發展做為校學規劃之主要考量。 2.參與式設計，提供替選方案供使用者參考。並透過溝通，與使用者共同設計學校。 3.考量校園天際線及校園規劃對於環境及使用者之影響。 4.建立開放式教育下教師培訓之制度，學習彈性空間使用及協同教學模式。 5.學校提供相關教學之場域及設備支援。 6.校園成為整合周遭資源的場所，建立學生與社區共同使用之場域。

關鍵字

淡水國小；校園規劃；新校園運動；兒童發展；校園天際線

並列摘要

On 21st of September in 1999, an earthquake of 7.3 magnitude quake ripped across the Taiwan island and causes major damage on school institutional building. Tamsui Elementary School was one of the affected. Until 2012, Tamsui Elementary School experienced 13 years of campus renovation works. Today, Tamsui Elementary School faces the demolishment of its chloride-ioned building subsequently getting rebuilt in the upcoming phase. The Principal hopes this opportunity can suggest a proper campus planning for the future of this School. This thesis is based on the research on the campus planning of Tamsui Elementary School. Through literature review, the study about the growth development of school kids and the influence of educational reform and open educational resources towards the educational space has been done, as well as the review of New Campus Movement after the 921 Earthquake. By carrying out survey and investigation, the observation on the analysis of the above school on its current school space usage is completed and then when the future planning is listed, the respective ideas are responded. The conclusion suggests three alternative planning proposals for the reference of the above school. Through literature review, issue investigation and design proposal, there are few suggestions for the school and planners:- 1.The growth development of school kids as the main consideration for campus planning. 2.Participatory Design provides alternatives for users as thought references. By communication, the building users can co-design the school with planners. 3.The influence of school skyline and campus planning towards environment and building users should be considered. 4.The training system of teachers, the learning of using flexible spaces and co-teaching mode under Open educational system should be created. 5.School authority should provide the related educational spaces and technical support. 6.School campus should act as the space that integrates the surrounding resources and become the co-sharing space of students with public communities.