「基源問題研究法」可能性銓定

本文主旨在研究勞思光的「基源問題研究法」（以下簡稱基源法）。主要是針對其「設準」的討論與重構，來展開一連串的申論。我們選用「現象學」與「突現理論」來嵌結、重構「設準」，再以「體驗論」突顯設準後的基源法在《中庸》的詮釋。換言之，我們以「現象學」、「突顯理論」作為方法（重構「設準」），以《中庸》作為「載體」－－詮釋、實驗對象，來突現基源法的問題與特色，並突顯基源法的可能性銓定與補足。　　至於研究的動機，則是源於「主體性」一詞的迷思。在牟宗三以後，「主體性」成為研究華夏哲學最重要的核心議題，無論基於承接或者反省都是無法迴避的重要課題。而透過我的研究我認為：「主體性」會緊扣著突現者本身的意義，這意思是主體所處的各類意義－－凡文化背景、意識形態、社會氛圍等等，都會造就「主體性」的差異。而這呈現的差異就在於：西方所言「主體性」是「個體」、「認識」的意義；而華夏哲學的「主體性」則是「群體普遍」、「體驗」的意義。所以「主體性」雖屬外來詞彙，卻不應當完全以西方的認識角度來詮釋。　　而「主體性」也與本文的研究主旨－－基源法息息相關，理由很簡單：基源法是研究華夏哲學的方法，那「主體性」問題必然嵌結於其中。　　《中庸》這部作品是嵌結「基源法」與「可能性」二者的中介嵌結，我們稱之為「載體」。所以，本論文是一套「方法論」的研究，研究的對象是基源法而非《中庸》，這意謂著《中庸》對我們而言是一個便於理解、突現基源法各個問題的手段，這在此先說明之。

關鍵字

基源問題研究法；主體性定位；體驗論；現象學；突現理論；《中庸》

並列摘要

This thesis is to research "Fundamental-question Method" of Sze-kwang Lao. (It abbreviates as Fundamental-Method.) It is focus on the discussion and reconstruction of "postulate". We choose "Phenomenology" and "Emergence theory"to connect and reconstruct the "postulate". Then, we use "experientialism" to reflect the interpretation of "Zhongyoung", which is from Fundamental Method of postulate.In other words, "Phenomenology" and "Emergence theory" are used as a method (to reconstruct the "postulate") , and "Zhongyoung" is used as “Forerunner” — interpretation or experimental object, which emerges questions and characteristics of Fundamental Method.In this way, Zhongyoung is also reflect the possibilities and supplement of Fundamental Method. 　　As to the motivation of research, it's from the question of "Subjectivity". After the period of Mou-Tsung San, "Subjectivity" becomes the most important core issue of Chinese philosophy. No matter it is based on succeeding or criticism, "Subjectivity" is an inevitable vital issue. Through this thesis, I consider that "Subjectivity" which emergences its meaning would close to itself. This kinds of meaning, such as cultural background, ideology, social phenomenon, leads to the differences of "Subjectivity". In western, "Subjectivity" is "Individuality" and "Cognition"; however, in Chinese philosophy, "Subjectivity" is "Communal universality" and "Experience". Although "Subjectivity" is loanword, it can't be interpreted by western "Cognition". 　　Besides, "Subjectivity" is related to "Fundamental-Method", which is the method of reserching Chinese philosophy. Hence, the question of "Subjectivity" must connect in it. 　　”Zhongyoung” is the interedium connection between "Fundamental-Method" and "Potentiality", and we call it “Forerunner". Thus, this thesis is a series of "Methodology", and the subject is not “Zhongyoung”, but "Fundamental-Method". That is, “Zhongyoung” is the strategy to realize easily, and to emerge "Fundamental- Method".