牟宗三程伊川學的詮釋問題——以Gadamer詮釋學為進路的考察

A Hermeneutic Approach to Mou Zongsan's Interpretation of Chen Yi's philosophy

張惟智(Wei-Chih Chang)

指導教授 ： 楊祖漢

共同指導教授 ： 高柏園(Po-Yawn Kao)

淡江大學/文學院/中國文學系碩士班/碩士(2014年)

https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2014.00897

摘要

本文根據牟宗三的程伊川詮釋，探究牟宗三的程伊川詮釋的問題意識以及理論基礎，並更進一步討論牟宗三的程伊川詮釋的理論基礎所面臨的問題，與透過Gadamer詮釋學的研究成果來回應此問題。
本文分為五章，第一章為研究目的、方法、觀點、步驟的展示；第二章藉由唐君毅、勞思光、鍾彩鈞、溫偉耀等學者的詮釋，呈現程伊川文本的詮釋現況，展現程伊川的文本具有多意義性的既存事實；第三章透過牟宗三對心性關係為一的規定，一步步循序分析說明牟宗三詮釋程伊川的理論基礎與此理論基礎的問題意識；第四章分析說明牟宗三建基於其理論基礎的詮釋觀點，並說明此詮釋觀點是無法根據李明輝的說法而證成俱有詮釋學循環，若牟宗三的詮釋觀點要具有詮釋學循環，則必須借助Gadamer的詮釋學研究成果，即視域融合，將牟宗三的詮釋觀點視為一種視域融合的結果，若如此，則可以具有詮釋學循環，也可以解決牟宗三的程伊川詮釋的三個問題；第五章為結論。

關鍵字

牟宗三、程伊川、康德、詮釋學、心、性

並列摘要

According to Mou Zongsan's(牟宗三) Interpretation of Cheng Yi's(程頤) philosophy, explore problem awareness and the theoretical basis in Mou Zongsan's Interpretation of Cheng Yi's philosophy, and further discuss the problem, that is in the theoretical basis of Mou Zongsan's Interpretation of Cheng Yi's philosophy, and through research production in Gadamer's hermeneutics to respond to this issue.
There are five chapters in this paper. The Chapter I shows research purposes, methods, ideas and steps. Chapter II shows the status of interpretation of Cheng Yi's text and the fact that there are a significance of multiple in Cheng Yi’s existing text by the interpretations of Tang Junyi(唐君毅), Lao Sze-Kwang(勞思光), Chung tsai-chun(鍾彩鈞) and Wan Milton(溫偉耀). Chapter III through revealing the provisions of relationship between Xin(心) and Hsin(性), and a step by step analyse and describe the theoretical basis of Mou Zongsan's Interpretation of Cheng Yi's philosophy to show background or foundation of the theoretical basis of his interpretation. Chapter IV describes Mou Zongsan’s interpretation that based on the theoretical basis of his views, and illustrates the view of interpretation is not based on the justification, that is there is a hermeneutical circle as Ming-hui(李明輝) pointed out.If there is a hermeneutical circle in Mou Zongsan's interpretation of Cheng Yi's philosophy, we could use Gadamer’s research results of hermeneutics, namely fusion of horizons, to consider the interpretation of the result of the view of Mou Zongsan‘s fusion of horizons, and then, we could solve three problems in Mou Zongsan's Interpretation of Cheng Yi's philosophy. Chapter V makes the final conclusion

並列關鍵字

Mou Zongsan, Chen Yi, Kant, Hermeneutics, Xin, Hsin

參考文獻

林安梧，《牟宗三前後——當代新儒家哲學思想史論》，臺北市：臺灣學生，2011年9月初版

李明輝，〈牟宗三先生的哲學詮釋中的方法論問題〉《中國文哲研究集刊》第八期，1996年3月

李瑞全，〈中國哲學現代之後的方向與發展：牟宗三先生兩層存有論的意涵〉《當代儒學研究》第一期，2007年1月

李明輝，〈牟宗三哲學中的「物自身」〉《中國文哲研究集刊》第3期1999年3月

陳榮灼，〈牟宗三對康德哲學的轉化〉《鵝湖學誌》第四十期，2008年6月