透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.222.35.21
  • 學位論文

以問題解決導向數位學習遊戲探究國小學生認知能力

The Investigation of Digital Problem-solving Learning Games on Cognition to Elementary School Students

指導教授 : 施如齡

摘要


本研究針對數位學習遊戲與問題解決策略兩方面結合之教學設計進行探討。研究中乃依據文獻所歸納之「問題解決導向數位學習遊戲(Digital problem-solving learning games, DPLG)」特性與設計流程,由配合之團隊開發一個實驗性遊戲「威廉歷險記」。並依據所歸納出之目標與任務、挑戰性、真實性、探索性、互動性、回饋、競爭與合作、與行動後學習等八項特性,以及分析問題解決歷程與Bloom認知教育目標分類之六大認知層次的關係,採用雙向細目表的方式,提出相關評估指標,做為實際施測之觀察工具。 其後透過專家評鑑,蒐集觀察指標與遊戲工具之修正意見。並針對遊戲預設之國小中、高年級學童,募集研究自願者,採取個人和同儕合作的方式,以訪談、觀察等質性研究方法,進行共兩次的使用者測試。透過學習路徑記錄、現場觀察與訪談記錄,架構出學習者與遊戲間的互動歷程,並與遊戲預設目標和專家評鑑遊戲工具之意見進行對照,來分析DPLG於學習者認知方面之教學功能,瞭解該實驗性遊戲的教學設計是否發揮其於學習上之功能,進而歸納與驗證DPLG之設計優缺。 研究發現:(一)注意力影響認知表現,而遊戲設計方式則影響學習者的注意力。(二)學習路徑反應學習者認知狀況,從其整體走向與各種角度可解讀其學習風格與意義。再者,內容呈現的順序影響學習者對學習順序的選擇。(三)學習者未展現高層次認知能力主要受遊戲設計缺失,以及學習者個人對學習困難所持之態度所影響。(四)舊有經驗影響學習者的認知表現,但影響程度會因對其應用層面之深淺而有不同。(五)同儕對學習者之認知能力有提升作用,但成長幅度乃由其合作的模式所決定。(六)關卡內容需呼應預設目標,以促成目標之達成。(七)更完善的遊戲提示將能成為好的學習鷹架,提升學習者的認知能力。 另外,在問題解決導向數位學習遊戲中,欲讓學習者之認知能力獲得運用與成長,遊戲的設計至關重要,包括:(一)順暢且正確的遊戲流程與操作介面;(二)教學目標、學習內容、與遊戲挑戰應環環相扣且具豐富性;(三)設計清楚的學習目標,以及適合學習者能力的挑戰;(四)在虛擬環境中提供充足且易用的提示與引導機制;(五)給予多元的互動與有意義的回饋;(六)故事情節是學習的鷹架;(七)學習進度的儲存與紀錄等。而研究亦發現,同儕對學習者認知成長有相當大的影響。透過適宜的合作技巧,學習者之認知層次將能有長足之進展。

並列摘要


This research aims to investigate the instructional design of digital games with problem-solving strategies. Based on related literatures, we induce the characteristics of “Digital problem-solving learning games, DPLG” and the instructional design principles and process. With a group of game development team, we create an experimental game called William Adventure. Eight learning characteristics of digital problem-solving games are found at the end, which include objectives and tasks, challenge, reality, exploration, interactive, feedback, competition and cooperation, and after action review. The characteristics are cross-analyzed with the six cognitive objectives in Bloom’s taxonomy, from which we generate a table of heuristics for evaluation. Then, expert evaluation on the criteria of game was conducted. Researcher invited elementary school children to participate two task analysis sessions, individual and collaborate gaming. Following with observations and interviews, qualitative data were collected which include gaming paths, behaviors and cognitive activities of learner-and-game interaction. Comparing the results with game’s objectives, the game’s effects on learners’ cognitive abilities are concluded to induce the DPLG design principles. The research found: (1) Learners’ attention affects their cognitive performance, and the design of game affects learner's attention. (2) The learning paths present learner's cognitive status and the analysis of their overall tendencies as well as from various angles can provide further information about learner’s learning style and significances. Furthermore, the order of task presentation can affect the learner’s choice on gaming paths. (3) The learners can not reach high level cognitive capacity is mainly because the flaw of game designs and learners’ attitudes toward difficult tasks. (4) Learners’ old experiences can affect their cognitive performance but are only limited to the depth of application. (5) Peers can help learners to elevate their cognitive abilities, but its level of growth depends on their cooperation pattern. (6) The tasks and content should echo the objectives of the tame so the completion of the tasks can be achieved. (7) Better cues in the game can become good learning scaffolds that can help to elevate learners’ cognitive performances. Moreover, the design of the digital problem-solving learning games is the key of learners’ cognitive performances. The principles include: (1) Smooth and correct game flow and operation interface. (2) The instructional goal, learning content, challenges should be meaningful and closely link to each other. (3) Design clearly-stated learning goals, as well as level-appropriate challenges. (4) Provide sufficient and easy to use prompt and guiding mechanism in the virtual leanring enviroenment. (5) Give diverse interaction and meaningful feedbacks. (6) The plot is the scaffolds for learning. (7) Learning progress record and documentation functions. The research concluds that peers are important factors to the success of learning. With appropriate collaboration skills, learners’ cognitive level can have considerable progress.

參考文獻


林奕宏、張景媛(2001)。多元智能與問題解決整合型教學模式對國小學生數學學習表現之影響。教育心理學報,第33卷第1期,1-30。
邱富宏,陳錦章(2002)。融入認知策略與工具的網路學習環境對學生學習影響之研究。科學教育學刊,第10卷第3期,261-286。
孫仲山,鄧佳茜(2006)。創造思考教學與問題解決模式之教學活動設計--以「刷刷車」為例。生活科技教育月刊,第39卷第3期,175-188。
徐崇誠(2005)。「問題本位學習」教學模式對國二學生問題解決能力與合作學習之影響。中原大學教育研究所碩士論文。未出版,桃園。
張玉山(2006)。創造力導向的網路化問題解決活動設計--國小生活科技課程的實例。生活科技月刊,第39卷第5期,48-64。

被引用紀錄


彭素貞(2015)。資訊融入遊戲式學習對國中七年級學生之歷史學習成效與學習態度之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2015.00611
王敬詠(2012)。應用電腦冒險遊戲式學習於專業英文課程對提升學習成效、學習動機與態度之影響〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2012.01045
陳心瑜(2011)。學習風格對於大學生遊戲式學習之問題解決歷程之影響研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2011.00835
林靜敏(2010)。冒險遊戲融入學習之設計與發展—以「專業英文」課程為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2010.01288
邱佳慧(2010)。應用WebQuest於部落格平台進行問題解決教學之行動研究—以社會領域為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2010.00315

延伸閱讀