透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.217.208.72
  • 學位論文

我國社會住宅周邊環境可近性評估-以六都為例

Evaluation of the Accessibility of the Surrounding Environment of Social Housing -A Case Study of Six Metropolitan Cities of Taiwan

指導教授 : 廖興中

摘要


本研究主要係針對我國社會住宅之可近性與選址進行研究,並以地理上的可近性進行分析。於評估方法上,則採取旅行成本法,並以線性路網環域分析為分析方法。而在評量指標上,則是參酌國內外住宅區位相關研究及政策報告書之標準,以交通設施(公車站、火車站、捷運站)、生活機能設施(超市、便利商店)、休閒娛樂設施(公園、綠地)、教育設施(國小、國中、幼稚園)、醫院設施(診所、醫院)、文化設施(圖書館)為評估指標。有關研究資料之獲得則以開放資料為主,自建資料為輔的方式獲得。研究結果發現現行的社會住宅對於設施的可近性表現上,大致都能符合政策指標,僅有少數的社會住宅出現與指標脫鉤的情形。首先,整體指標表現來說呈現區域性的差異。其次,在教育設施的可近性上,出現教育資源雙重缺乏的情形。復次,部分社會住宅坐落於新開發之都市計畫區、重劃區,然而囿限於該區域尚未完全發展成熟,故各項設施的可近性較為缺乏。最後,除臺北市外,各直轄市的可近性較差的社會住宅都具有一項指標表現較其他指標為疲弱。另外,本研究亦發現我國開放資料無法滿足「質」的需求之情形。

並列摘要


The research mainly analyzes the accessibility and site selection of social housing based on geographical accessibility. The evaluation method uses the travel cost method and uses the line-based network buffer as the analysis method. Evaluation indicators are based on domestic and foreign research and policy reports, and propose transportation facilities (bus stations, railway stations, MRT stations), life function facilities (supermarkets, convenience stores), leisure and entertainment facilities (parks, green spaces), educational facilities ( elementary school, middle school, kindergarten), hospital facilities (clinics, hospitals), cultural facilities (libraries).The research data is mainly obtained by open data, supplemented by self-built data. The results of the study found that the accessibility of social housing to facilities generally met the policy indicators, and only a few social housing failed to meet the policy indicators. First, the overall indicator performance shows regional differences. Secondly, the accessibility of educational facilities appears to be a double lack of educational resources. Third, some social housing is located in the newly developed urban planning area, and the accessibility of facilities is relatively lacking because the area is not yet fully developed. Finally, with the exception of Taipei City, all municipalities' social housing has one indicator that is weaker than the others. In addition, this study also found that open data cannot meet the needs of "quality".

參考文獻


江明芸(2011)。社會住宅,從民間倡議到政府爆衝。新社會政策,(14),8-12。
江穎慧(2011)。社會住宅的迷思。新社會政策,(15),30-31。
林育如(2011)。社會住宅在臺灣的實踐之路。新社會政策,(14),17-20。
林萬億(2003)。論我國的社會住宅政策與社會照顧的結合。國家政策季刊,2(4),53-82。
法務部(2018)。公民與政治權利國際公約經濟社會文化權利國際公約一般性意見。臺北:法務部。

延伸閱讀