透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.138.200.66
  • 學位論文

台灣再生能源政策變遷之研究

A Study on the Change of Taiwan's Renewable Energy Policy

指導教授 : 柯玉佳

摘要


本研究將預算漸進理論及間斷平衡理論延伸至探討台灣再生能源政策變化及效率。為了檢驗政策輸入及輸出之間的關係,本研究使用西元2007年至2020年行政院經濟部能源局的單位預算資料,及三類能源相關基金預算作為政策輸入指標,以及台灣再生能源發電裝置容量作為政策輸出指標;並使用間斷平衡理論中的組織摩擦要素探討兩者關聯。 本研究採用敘述性統計以實證了解所使用資料的穩定性及間斷程度。結果發現,除了能源局預算資料呈現符合漸進式理論之分佈模式之外,其餘所有資料在所指定時間區間內皆呈現間斷程度不等的分佈模式。輸入及輸出指標間亦存在政策滯後,以質性角度進行描述之。 本研究結論預算間斷理論應用於非預算資料分析之有效性。儘管相關產業政策受到高度矚目,若相關利害關係人無法提供具一致性之外部環境,仍可能使企業遇到阻礙,進而影響政策之效率及預期結果。

並列摘要


This study extends the theoretical approaches of Incrementalism Theory and Punctuated Equilibrium Theory to investigate Taiwan’s renewable energy policy change and efficiency. To examine the relation between policy input and output, this study uses the 2007 - 2020 budgeting for the Bureau of Energy (the Ministry of Economic Affairs) and three energy-related funds data as input indicators, while Taiwan’s accumulative installed capacity of renewable energy as output indicators. Furthermore, institutional frictions are introduced to describe the relations in between. This study adopts descriptive statistics to confirm empirical evidence for stability and punctuality. The results of this study show that all indicators display evidence for different degree of punctual changes in given periods except the unit budgeting of the Bureau of Energy depicts an incremental distribution. There are policy lags existing between input and output indicators, which are elaborated from a qualitative perspective. This research thus concludes that applications of Punctuality Equilibrium Theory to non-budgeting dataset. Despite the high attention distributed on the agenda, when related stakeholders failed to provide a consistent external environment, firms encountered obstacles, reducing policy’s efficiency in converting to expected outputs.

參考文獻


Baumgartner, F. R., Breunig, C., Green-Pedersen, C., Jones, B. D., Mortensen, P. B., Nuytemans, M., & Walgrave, S. (2009). Punctuated equilibrium in comparative perspective. American Journal of Political Science, 53(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00389.x
Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1991). Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems. The Journal of Politics, 53(4). https://doi.org/10.2307/2131866
Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Choice Reviews Online, 31(01). https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.31-0574
Bian, Z., Zuo, F., Gao, J., Chen, Y., Pavuluri Venkata, S. S. C., Duran Bernardes, S., Ozbay, K., Ban, X. (Jeff), & Wang, J. (2021). Time lag effects of COVID-19 policies on transportation systems: A comparative study of New York City and Seattle. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.01.019
Birkland, T. A. (1998a). After disaster: agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Choice Reviews Online, 35(08). https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-4778

延伸閱讀