影響非自用住宅屋主參與社會住宅包租代管意願之因素探討-以桃園市為例

社會住宅包租代管已經成為我國協助弱勢族群取得適宜居住環境的重要途徑。雖然臺灣主要城市空屋率高，包租代管的屋源卻供給不足。因此本研究認為實有必要探討如何提升非自用住宅屋主參與社會住宅包租代管的意願，進而改善屋源供給不足的問題，達到協助弱勢族群順利取得適宜居住環境的目的。桃園市是全國社會住宅包租代管執行成效最佳的城市，受到包租代管屋源供給不足的影響，推動進度仍顯落後。相對的桃園市空屋率高，非自用住宅屋主手上仍有許多「空屋」或未出租的住宅可以投入包租代管。因此本研究以桃園市的非自用住宅屋主為對象，進行問卷調查，採用Binary Logistic Regression Model分析，探討影響非自用住宅屋主參與社會住宅包租代管意願之因素。依據實證分析的結果，本研究提出政策上調整的建議包括: 加強溝通分享已參與房東的經驗、評估提供合乎預期的「相對租金」、建立租金墊償保險機制、強化專業者協助機制、形成影響屋主參與包租代管的社會氛圍以及建立屋主公益出租人的認同等。期望能透過政策上的調整，提升非自用住宅屋主參與社會住宅包租代管的意願，進而增加包租代管屋源的供給，最終逐步達成協助弱勢族群獲得適宜的居住環境之目標。

關鍵字

社會住宅包租代管；非自用住宅；空屋率；參與意願

並列摘要

Leasing and subleasing management scheme (LSMS) for social housing has become an important policy to assist disadvantaged groups in obtaining a suitable living environment in Taiwan. Although the rate of vacancy houses in major cities of Taiwan is high, the supply of the housing for LSMS is insufficient. Therefore, this study tries to explore how to increase the willingness of non-self-use housing homeowners to participate in LSMS for social housing, thereby improving the problem of insufficient housing supply, and achieve the purpose of assisting disadvantaged groups to successfully obtain a suitable living environment. Taoyuan City is the city with the best performance in the implementation of LSMS for social housing in Taiwan. Nevertheless, affected by the insufficient housing supply for LSMS, the progress of LSMS is lagging behind. In the meantime, Taoyuan City has a high housing vacancy rate, and there are still many "vacant houses" or unleased houses of none-self-use housing that can be put into LSMS. Therefore, this study conducts a questionnaire survey to non-self-use housing homeowners in Taoyuan City and uses Binary Logistic Regression Model to analyze the factors that affect the homeowners' willingness to participate in LSMS for social housing. Based on the research results of the empirical study, the recommendations for policy adjustments include: strengthening communication and sharing the experience of participating landlords, evaluating and providing “reasonable rents” that meets expectations, establishing a rent advance insurance mechanism, strengthening professional assistance mechanism, forming a social atmosphere that affects the homeowners' participation in LSMS, and establishing the identity of landlords’ public welfare lessors. It is hoped that through policy adjustments, the willingness of non-self-use housing homeowners to participate in LMS for social housing will be improved, and the supply of housing sources will be increased. Ultimately, the goal of helping disadvantaged groups to obtain a suitable living environment can be gradually achieved.