巨磁阻磁力計於磁源反算問題分析

Magnetic inverse problem by using GMR magnetometer

廖問初(Wen-Chu Liao)

指導教授 ： 鄭振宗

國立臺北科技大學/機電學院/製造科技研究所/碩士(2006年)

https://doi.org/10.6841/NTUT.2006.00119

摘要

本論文比較了傅立葉變換與最小模估計兩種演算方法，探討源電流分佈近似解的空間鑑別度與準確度。磁場量測係採用巨磁阻磁力計，其量測範圍約2

關鍵字

二維磁通密度圖 ； 巨磁阻磁力計 ； 傅立葉變換 ； 最小模估計

並列摘要

In the recent decades, the great progresses have been made on the measurement techniques for tiny magnetic fields. This creates more possibilities in the applications of high-resolution magnetic-flux-density maps. However, to figure out the source current distribution according to a magnetic-field map is an ill-posed problem, which does not have a unique solution. Some appropriate assumptions on the source are necessary in order to obtain an approximate solution of the inverse problem.
In this work, two inversion algorithms, including the Fourier transform (FT) and the minimum norm estimate (MNE), are compared in their spatial resolutions and image qualities achievable. The magnetic-flux-density map are measured with the giant magnetoresistive magnetometer, of which the detectable range is 2 mT to 2 nT (120 dB) and the flat bandwidth is 20 kHz. It was found that the major factors affecting the image quality of source currents are the source-to-field distance, the current continuity, and the magnetometer noise. The MNE method is slightly superior to the FT in image quality and spatial resolution, but the FT algorithm is much faster. With the optimized filtering, one can satisfactorily retrieve the source-current distribution. For the MNE algorithm, the optimal filtering parameter of singular values is about 0.01 to 0.001, which is independent of the source-to-field distance. For the FT algorithm, the optimal cutoff spatial frequency is about 2.0 mm-1 to 2.5 mm-1 with the source-to-field distance of 3

並列關鍵字

magnetic-flux-density map ； giant magnetoresistive magnetometer ； Fourier transform ； minimum norm estimate

參考文獻

[31]李冠勳，差動式渦電流探頭於缺陷偵測之最佳激發頻率研究，碩士論文，國立台北科技大學製造科技研究所，台北，2005

[1]J.E. Lenz., J.E. Lenz., “A Review of Magnetic Sensors,” Proc IEEE, vol.78, No. 6, pp.973-989 ,1990

[3]D. Koelle, “High-transition temperature superconducting quantum interference devices: basic concepts and fabrication and applications,” Journal of Electroceramics, vol. 3 ,No. 2, pp.195-212, 1999

[5]B. J. Roth, N. G. Sepulveda, J. P. Wikswo Jr., “Using a magnetometer to image a two-dimensional current distribution,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 65, pp.361-372 ,1989.

[6]S. Chatraphom, E. F. Fleet, and F. C. Wellstood, “Relationship between spatial resolution and noise in scanning superconducting quantum interference device microscopy,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 92, pp. 4731-4740, 2002