聯合社區夥伴關係運作之研究─以大溪鎮旗艦社區領航計畫為例

A Study on the Operation of Partnership in United Community─the Example of the Pilot Project of Flagship Community in Dasi Township

張家菖(CHIA-CHANG CHANG)

指導教授 ： 李弘暉

元智大學/管理學院/管理研究所/碩士(2008年)

摘要

本研究是以2007年參與「大溪鎮旗艦社區領航計畫」中的政府部門人員、聯合社區及民間社團組織成員、社區居民等三者為研究對象，透過客觀的問卷調查方式進行資料彙整統計分析，藉以瞭解夥伴之間的互動參與情況及支持協助模式，並對聯合社區目前所遭遇到的困境研擬對策措施，進而匯集各方共識提出未來願景目標，也希望藉其聯合社區發展經驗模式，以提供未來有意發展聯合社區之社區夥伴人作參考。
根據問卷調查結果分析並參考相關文獻理論後，歸納出以下的研究結論：
一、社區意識的高低，會影響社區居民的認同參與程度。
二、社區結盟歷程是由初期協商階段的同盟關係，逐步進展到平等
合作的夥伴關係。
三、大體而言，內部夥伴之間的互動參與情況，要比外部夥伴來得
良好，惟仍受到受訪者本身的參與程度及主觀認知所影響。
四、在能給聯合社區最大的支持協助的面向上，不同的夥伴類型，
呈現多面化，經由匯集各夥伴之共識後，綜整出「經費補
助」、「法令諮詢」、「經費核銷」、「整合共識」、「人力
資源」、「計畫撰寫」及「認同參與」等七項。
五、在面對聯合社區的困難及改進上，各個夥伴類型的看法頗有一
致性。政府部門人員認為是「人力資源」；聯合社區及民間社
團組織成員認為是「經費核銷」；而社區居民則認為是「認同
參與」。
六、在解決聯合社區的困境之道，綜整出「充足的人力資源」、
「完備的規章制度」、「共同的目標願景」、「良好的夥伴關
係」、「充裕的經費補助」及「完善的輔導機制」等六項對策
措施。
七、在未來的目標願景上，夥伴們認為要在「凝聚社區意識永續發
展」的基礎上，分別朝向「拓展文化觀光產業特色」、「人才
培育提昇社區能量」及「建立社區互助人本關懷」三大面向一
同努力，將「資源聯結帶動區域發展」。

關鍵字

福利社區化；社區意識；社區參與；社區結盟；夥伴關係；聯合社區

並列摘要

This research conducted objective enquiry using questionnaires on people from government agencies, members of united communities and private groups, and community residents who participated in the “Pilot Project of Flagship Community in Dasi Township” in 2007 as subjects, to gather data and make statistical analysis, whereby to understand the interaction and involvement as well as the support and assistance mode between partners. This research also worked on the countermeasures against the dilemma the united communities are currently encountering, and further proposed, with consensus from various parties summarized, future vision and goals. It further hoped to provide such mode of developmental experience of united communities as reference in future for community partners who wish to develop united communities.
The analysis of the survey results by questionnaires, with related literature and theories taken as reference, led to the following conclusions:
1.The level of consciousness about community affects
community residents’ recognition and involvement.
2.The process of forming alliance between communities
begins with an alliance at the initial negotiation stage
and evolves, gradually, to a partnership of equal
cooperation.
3.In general, internal partnerships perform better than
external ones in terms of both interaction and level of
involvement; however, this can and will be affected by
the level of involvement and the subjective cognition of
the subjects themselves
4.In respect of the ability to provide maximum support and
assistance to united communities, there is a diversity
displayed by different types of partnerships. With the
consensus of every partner summarized, seven aspects are
grouped; they are “financial subsidy”, “legal
consultation”, “recognition for expenses”,
“consensus integration”, “human resources”, “project
composition” and “recognition and involvement”.
5.The partnerships of different types have good
consistence toward the difficulties and improvements for
united communities. People from government agencies
believe it is “human resources”, while members of
united communities and private groups believe it is
“recognition for expenses”, and community residents,
“recognition and involvement”.
6.In the methods of solving predicaments for united
communities, six countermeasures are induced:
“sufficient human resources”, “perfect regulation and
system”, “shared goal and vision”, “sound
partnership”, “ample financial subsidy” and “sound
counseling mechanism”.
7.In connection to future goal and vision, the partners
think that it is important to work hand in hand in the
tracks of “developing cultural and tourist
industries”, “enhancing community energy by fostering
able persons” and “building mutual support and humane
concerns in community”, based on “convergence of
community will and sustainable development”, so as to
“link the resources to help regional development”.

並列關鍵字

communization of welfare； community consciousness； involvement in community； alliance of communities； partnership； united community

參考文獻

14.唐啓明（1997），「臺灣省社會福利社區化的過去、現在與未

17.桃園縣政府（2007），桃園縣旗艦社區領航計畫說明會手冊，

41.桃園縣政府網站

6.吳宜蓁（1996），「有線電視公益頻道規劃與社區意識的提

18.張菀珍（2001），「社區組織建構社區學習資源網絡之研究-台