隨著企業經營的競爭日益激烈,追求卓越品質以提升企業競爭力,為經營者所面臨的ㄧ項大議題,經由全面品質管理與相關專案活動的推行,有助於改善品質水準與提升經營成效。除此之外,企業中專業知識被有效率移轉的速度,也能夠明顯的增加企業的競爭能力與經營績效,因此本研究希望藉由探討品質改善團隊(Quality Improvement Team, QIT)與知識管理機制(Knowledge Management Mechanisms, KM)的推動,幫助企業達到成功不墜的核心競爭優勢。 本文旨在探討品質改善團隊與知識管理機制對團隊績效產生之影響,並驗證知識管理機制是否會對品質改善團隊與團隊績效產生干擾效果。本研究首先參考國內、外學者提出影響品質改善團隊成敗的相關文獻,共歸納出六項攸關QIT成敗的因素,分別為企業文化、組織支持、教育訓練、個人意願、激勵制度、領導行為。衡量企業的知識管理能力,則分為知識創造、知識整合與知識的移轉三部份,並參考多位學者提出的團隊績效指標,選取符合本研究之問項,作為團隊績效的衡量準則。 本文研究對象以國內有推行QIT相關活動的企業為主,問卷調查對象以曾經參與過品質改善團隊,或其公司有推行此活動而尚未參加的員工。經研究分析後,發現品質改善團隊與知識管理機制的提昇確實有助於團隊績效的改善;而知識管理機制運作較佳的企業,能夠彌補在教育訓練上的不足,產生較高的團隊績效。因此本研究建議國內企業在推動品質改善團隊的進行時,應針對企業文化、組織支持、教育訓練、個人意願、激勵制度、領導行為與以全方位的考量,並鼓勵台灣企業應不該單單只把知識管理視為資訊科技的工具,而宜重新思考知識管理的策略及附加價值,利用品質改善團隊與知識管理機制的相互結合,建立企業的經營績效與競爭優勢。
As enterprises competition become drastic, it’s a big issue for entrepreneurs to enhance competition ability. Through total quality management and related activities can improve quality and raise business performance. Besides this, the speed of enterprise knowledge efficiently is disseminated will have also enhancing competition ability and raise business performance. This thesis will probe the impact of quality improvement team (QIT) and knowledge management (KM) on team performance and whether KM will moderate QIT toward team performance. After referring to scholars’ opinions of influencing QIT successful and failed elements, the thesis will generalize six elements including culture, organization support, education training, inclination, motivation and leadership. KM will be divided into knowledge creation, generalization and dissemination to measure abilities of enterprises. Team performance is measured by indexes that scholars’ consulting and take appropriate items to match that. Samples are focused on domestic driving QIT or related activities enterprises whose employees joined QIT or not. After analysis QIT and KM could have the positive impacts on team performance and enterprises which have better KM will retrieve the lack of training to bring up team performance. It’s suggested that enterprises should have overall thinking about QIT elements and rethink the strategy and additional value of KM. It would establish business performance and competitive advantages by matching QIT and KM.