透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.22.100.180
  • 學位論文

基於凱利方格技術的網路互評系統

Networked Peer Assessment System Based on Kelly’s Repertory Grid Technique

指導教授 : 劉寶鈞 博士 劉晨鐘 博士
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


摘 要 線上學習目前正在網路上蓬勃發展,一個好的線上學習環境,除了要能夠引導個別學生進行學習,也要擁有充足的知識以提供學生在學習上適當的支援。本研究試圖提出一種新的網路互評環境,以凱利方格技術為基礎,經由互評活動的進行,使用三元組引出學生的構念,互評結果以凱利方格的方式呈現,一方面可提供老師探測學生的學習認知及作為同學間互評結果的回饋,另一方面可擷取互評作品的特徵,這些特徵將可使線上學習系統累積的作品可以再度被使用。本研究以元智大學資工系二年級學生為受試者,使用「加州批判思考測驗A式」測量學生的批判思考能力後進行分組,經過網路互評實驗,發現使用凱利方格互評環境的學生使用較多的特定性構念。學生互評後與互評前觀念上的進步,以低批判思考能力且使用凱利方格互評環境的學生進步最多,低批判思考能力且使用一般互評環境的學生進步最少,高批判思考能力使用凱利方格互評環境和一般互評環境的進步情形差不多。在本課程的實驗中,凱利方格的互評環境在作品特徵的擷取方面有不錯的貢獻,對批判思考能力低的學生有較大的幫助。實驗後施測的問卷結果顯示使用凱利方格互評環境的學生認為系統可以幫助其構念的產生與作品特徵的描述,大多數學生都肯定網路互評對於學習的幫助,對系統的使用大都感到滿意。

並列摘要


ABSTRACT Web learning provides not only activity platforms for individual students, but also knowledge for enhancing the learning of students. This research attempts to develop a novel peer assessment environment on the Internet. Based on Kelly’s repertory grid technique, triad portfolio assessment setting is used to derive the personal constructs of students. Repertory grids represent the peer assessment results. The grids enable teachers to probe into the cognition of students and as the feedback of peer assessment. In addition, the grid annotate characteristic of students’ portfolios. These characteristics make students’ portfolios can be reused. Subjects of the experiment are computer science department sophomore at Yuan-Ze University. California Critical Thinking Skills Test Form A are used to measure students’ critical thinking. Results indicate students’ using repertory grid environment posed more specific constructs. In addition, students who have low critical thinking score and using repertory grid environment made great enhancement, while students who are low critical thinking and using general environment made comparatively little. The questionnaire shows that students who used repertory grid environment agree that the system can reveals characteristics of portfolios and the environment can derive their personal constructs.

參考文獻


[6] Conway, Robert & Kember, David , “Peer assessment of an individual’s contribution to a group project”, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol.18, Issue 1, 45-56, 1993.
[7] Eric Zhi-Feng Liu, Sunny S. J. Lin, Chi-Huang Chiu, & Shyan-Ming Yuan, “Web-Based peer review: The learner as both adapter and reviewer”, IEEE Transactions on Education , Vol. 44, No. 3, 246-251, 2001.
[9] Freeman, Mark , “Peer assessment by groups of group work”, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 20, Issue 3, 289-300, 1995.
[10] Goldfinch, Judy , “Further developments in peer assessment of group projects”, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 19, Issue 1, 29-35, 1994.
[11] Jack McGourty, “Using Multisource Feedback in the Classroom: A Computer-Based Approach”, IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 43, No. 2, May 2000.

被引用紀錄


李晧銘(2016)。使用線上同儕互評機制探討學生學習成就與同儕互評觀點之關係研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2016.00286
黃信翰(2013)。應用凱利方格法探勘物種識別構念之研究〔碩士論文,長榮大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6833/CJCU.2013.00121
張盈兮(2002)。範例基礎之推理機制及學生作品再利用之線上學習輔助系統〔碩士論文,元智大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0009-0112200611333306
高慧君(2003)。網路同儕互評於教學實習之成效分析〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-2603200719135482
尤仁佐(2003)。基於個人構念結構之學習作品探索系統〔碩士論文,元智大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0009-0112200611360592

延伸閱讀