行政院鑒於健全社區為台灣社會安定的力量,於2005年提出「台灣健康社區六星計畫」,以產業發展、環保生態、人文教育、社區治安、環境景觀、社福醫療等六大面向作為社區評量指標。但治安形勢益形複雜,犯罪問題並非單純的治安問題,實乃整體社會問題,牽涉層面非常廣,要消弭犯罪,政府必須親身與民眾站在同一陣線,達成共同治理社區治安的目標。本研究選擇桃園縣「治安示範社區」之ㄧ的八德市大智里作為研究對象進行分析,研究主要目的在了解大智里的治安網絡、互動要素、治理優勢及困難之處;在研究方法上,本研究採質化研究的深度訪談。 研究結果發現大智里在不同的治理時期,網絡治理主體因參與程度不同,其網絡位置也有所差異,而大智里在領導者的帶頭參與之下,成員凝聚共識、透過不斷學習、彼此關懷鼓勵、善用人力資源與資訊科技等等優勢下,呈現出網絡治理的成效。對於大智里治理的困境,本研究建議:一、政府相關部門間的水平整合;二、政策要持續而且要有專人負責業務;三、社區人才幹部的培訓;四、社區資源連結的強化;五、加強與非營利團體的合作;六、落實社區評鑑工作。期待透過這樣的研究,讓大智里的治安社區營造更具發展性,另外也可提供其它社區學習參考。
The Executive Yuan views the perfect community as the foundation for the Taiwan society stability and proposes “the Taiwan healthy community six-star project”. The community comments the quantity target by the industrial development, the environmental protection ecology, the humanities education, the community security, the environment landscape, and the society medical care. However, public security is getting complicated, crime has turned out to be an overall social problem, rather than simply public security. The problem involves a very broad level. In order to eliminate crime, the Government must stand on the same front with the public to attain a common goal of governing public security in community. This study aims to choose one of “public security model communities: Dajhih Village, Bade City, Taoyuan County as a research subject to do an analysis. The purpose of this study is to understand the interactive elements, governance advantages and disadvantages of the network of public security. The findings of the study shows that during the various control periods at Dajhih Village, the network governance body may have different network locations due to different levels of participation.Under the active participations of leaders in Dajhih Village, members have reached a common consensus to work together through constant learning, mutual care and encouragement. In addition, members are capable of making the best use of human resources and information technology and other advantages to demonstrate the outstanding results of network governance. In conclusion, the study gives the following proposals for the dilemma of the governance of Dajhih Village. 1. Horizontal integration between government departments 2. Consistent policy and special staff in charge 3. Community talents and personnel training 4. Enforcement of connecting the community resources 5. Enhancement and cooperation of non-profit organization 6. Carrying out the community assessment work. It is hoped that such a study can help the Dajhih Village create more sustainable community development and it can serve a model to emulate for other communities.