我國在實施電信自由化之政策以來,電信產業在推展行動通信服務上,受限於民眾抗爭、建築相關法規及地方政府對行動電信基地台設置之限制,其種種因素,徒增電信業者之營運困擾外,也對通訊服務品質造成影響,在推動行動電信網路的建置形成莫大的阻礙。 為此本研究以:1、行動電信基地台之設置管理,是否為中央專屬之立法權限,抑或地方政府可立法管理之?;2、電信法與新舊公寓大廈管理條例之關係;3、若干地方政府與立法委員對基地台提出許多管理或修法草案版本,各版本之間對於管理之方式與寛嚴標準,差異極大,何等管理方式及寬嚴程度,屬於較合理可行的版本?為研究方向。用法律制度研究之方式,採文献研究及分析歸納為研究方法。 經分析歸納後,本研究結論為1、行動電信基地台之設置管理,係屬全國一致性者,為中央專屬之立法權限,地方政府不宜立法管理之。2、基於每部法律之立法精神與目的,因此關於公寓大廈住戶權力之行使,電信法不宜排除公寓大廈管理條例之規範。3、為能保障行動通訊之服務品質,且能維護公寓大廈住戶之權利,基地台設置不宜過度限制,回歸公寓大廈管理條例規範之。
Taiwan is carrying out the policy of telecommunications liberalization. The industry of mobile telecommunications has had a problem on installing base stations. Mobile companies often faced protests of inhabitants and their neighbors. Construction regulations and local governments also made it difficult to set up base stations. This thesis is concluded with the following findings: 1. From the perspective of the Constitution, the power to regulate mobile telecommunications base stations belongs to the central government, not local governments. 2. Every law has its own purpose and mandate. Lawmakers should not pass provisions in the “Telecommunications Act” to preclude the application of the “Management Act for Apartments and Buildings” to base stations. 3. In order to protect the service quality of mobile communication and to safeguard the inhabitant's rights, installation of base stations should be regulated in accordance with the “Management Act for Apartments and Buildings.”