This paper investigates the impact of analyst coverage and the dispersion in analyst's earnings forecast on a stock's idiosyncratic volatility. Stocks with higher analyst coverage are expected to reveal more firm-specific information and are therefore hypothesized to increase the idiosyncratic volatility. The study finds results rejecting this hypothesis. The evidence however can be reconciled with the argument that information provided by financial analysts contains more industry-wide or market-wide information as well, resulting higher stock price synchronicity or lower idiosyncratic risk. I also find that a larger disagreement about a stock tend to destabilize its stock price, leading to higher idiosyncratic volatility.