This paper examines whether the credibility of open market share repurchase increases with the strong board structures (high percent independent directors, small board size, separate CEO-chair, low percent busy directors, and high percent certi旻d inside directors). I present evidence consistent with theories that the firm with the small board of directors is more efficient to monitor and have the better credibility of open market share repurchase. Ranking the board structures to two subsamples, I find the mean (median) differences of board size dummy are positive. The result is robust to numerous controls for insider purchases, actual repurchases, assets, book-to-market, stock price runup, and cash. I find that there is positive relationship between small board size and post-repurchase actual repurchases. Furthermore, I show that companies with small board size also exhibit more favorable values for post-repurchase long-term return and operating performance.