透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.145.170.65
  • 學位論文

居家照護個案壓瘡發生相關因子之探討

Factors associated with occurrence of pressure ulcers among Home-Care clients.

指導教授 : 王瑞霞

摘要


本研究目的為(1)探討居家照護個案的人口學及疾病特性、主要照顧者人口學及照顧特性與居家照護個案壓瘡發生關係, (2)探討居家照護個案的壓瘡發生危險因素、主要照顧者負荷、皮膚照護自我效能、皮膚照護行為與居家照護個案壓瘡發生關係,(3)探討居家照護個案壓瘡發生之重要解釋因子。 採橫斷性研究設計,採立意取樣,以年滿18歲以上,照顧出院4至6週且接受居家照護的個案至少一個月以上之主要照顧者為研究對象。收集南部五家醫院附設居家護理所的220位主要照顧者,去除12位在住院時發生壓瘡,及40位住院前即發生壓瘡的居家照護個案,共收集168位主要照顧者之資料。採結構式問卷調查方式,問卷內容包括居家照護個案人口學及疾病特性、主要照顧者人口學及照顧特性、居家照護個案壓瘡發生危險因素、主要照顧者負荷、皮膚照護自我效能、皮膚照顧行為及居家照護個案皮膚損傷狀態等量表。量表經信度及效度檢定,包含內在一致性、再測信度、專家效度與表面效度。研究資料以百分比、平均值、標準差、雙樣本t檢定、卡方檢定及逐步對數複廻歸分析進行分析。 研究結果發現(1)居家照護個案出院後4至6週,壓瘡發生率為10.9%,壓瘡盛行率為34.5%(2)居家照護個案罹患泌尿道感染、存有留置尿管、曾發生過壓瘡、未使用減壓輔具及未使用氣墊床者其壓瘡發生率較高,近於顯著關係。(3)主要照顧者無人協助替換照顧及住院時護理人員無指導壓瘡預防技能者其居家照護個案的壓瘡發生率較高,且近於顯著意義。(4)居家照護個案的壓瘡風險評估平均總分為12.85分,具有中等程度的壓瘡發生危險。(5)主要照顧者呈現中度負荷感受,標準化得分為60.50。(6)主要照顧者呈現中上程度皮膚照護自我效能,標準化得分為88.41。(7)主要照顧者呈現中上程度皮膚照護行為,標準化得分為83.25。(8)有壓瘡者的主要照顧者負荷無顯著高於無壓瘡者 (9)無壓瘡者的主要照顧者皮膚照護自我效能及皮膚照護行為顯著優於有壓瘡者。(10) 主要照顧者有人輪流替換照顧及皮膚照護行為是居家照護個案壓瘡發生重要的解釋因子,可解釋10.4%至18.7%之解釋變異數。 本研究結果建議居家護理師在居家照護時,需追蹤主要照顧者的皮膚照護行為及了解是否有人協助替換照顧,進行適當的介入與指導,以降低居家照護個案壓瘡之發生。

並列摘要


The purposes of this study were (1) to explore the relationships of demographic and disease characteristics of home-care clients and demographic and caregiving characteristics of caregivers, to occurrence of pressure ulcers in home-care clients; (2) to explore the relationship of risk factors for pressure ulcers, caregiver burden, skin care self-efficacy, skin care behavior to the occurrence of pressure ulcers in home-care clients; (3) to explore the significant explanatory factors for the occurrence of pressure ulcers in home-care clients. The study adopted a cross-sectional design with a purposive sampling of caregivers who were aged 18 or above, and who cared for over a one-month period for home-care clients who had been discharged from hospitals for 4-6 weeks. We recruited 220 caregivers from hospital-based home care units in southern Taiwan and then excluded 12 and 40 caregivers of patients who had pressure ulcers during and before hospitalizations respectively. Finally, data of 168 caregivers were collected. Structured questionnaires, including demographic and disease characteristics of home-care clients, demographic and caregiving characteristics of caregivers, risk factors for pressure ulcer occurrence, caregiver burden, skin care self-efficacy, skin care behavior, and skin conditions of home-care clients were used to collect data. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content validity, and surface validity were examined to verify the reliability and validity of all questionnaires. Data were analyzed using percentage, mean, standard deviation, two-sample t-test, chi-square test and stepwise logistic regression analysis. Results showed that (1) the incidence and prevalence rates of pressure ulcer occurrence in home-care clients at 4 to 6 weeks after discharge were 10.9% and 34.5% respectively; (2) home-care clients with urinary tract infection, urinary catheters, history of pressure ulcers and clients without using assistive devices or air cushion beds for pressure relief had significantly high incidence rate of pressure ulcers in clients; (3) caregivers without help of substitute caregivers and without guidance for pressure ulcer prevention by nursing staff during hospitalization showed significantly high incidence rate of pressure ulcers in clients; (4) the mean total score of pressure ulcer risk assessment in home-care clients was 12.85, indicating a medium level risk of pressure ulcer occurrence; (5) the standardized score in caregiver burden was 60.50, indicating a medium level of burden; (6) the standardized score in skin care self-efficacy of caregivers was 88.41, indicating an above medium level of skin care self-efficacy; (7) the standardized score in skin care behavior of caregivers was 83.25, indicating an above medium level of skin care behavior; (8) no significant difference existed in caregiver burden among caregivers of home-care clients with or without pressure ulcers; (9) caregivers of home-care clients without pressure ulcers were significantly better in both skin care self-efficacy and skin care behavior than those of clients with pressure ulcers; (10) with substitute caregivers and skin care behavior were the most significant explanatory factors for pressure ulcers, which explained 8% to 14.4% of the variation. The results of the study suggest home care nurses should follow up both caregivers’ skin care behavior and their need for substitute caregivers, and then provide further intervention to reduce the occurrence of pressure ulcers in home-care clients.

參考文獻


邱啟潤、許淑敏、吳瓊滿(2002).主要照顧者負荷、壓力與因應之國內研究文獻回顧.醫護科技學刊,4(4),273-290。
邱怡玟、林文元、謝柏均、李佳霙、邱瓊慧(2005).長期照護機構住民營養狀態評估指標之研究.實證護理,1(2),112-122。
呂如分(2005).中風病患主要照顧者生活品質及其相關因素之探討.長期照護雜誌,9(2),152-170。
中文文獻
于博芮、戴玉慈(1999).壓瘡預防—減壓床墊之比較與護理應用.護理雜誌,46(2),33-39。

被引用紀錄


李愛誠(2011)。居家護理與護理之家照護品質之探討〔碩士論文,亞洲大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0118-1511201215465910
黃元宏(2014)。防壓瘡氣墊床分壓機構之專利分析與設計〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-2611201410192095
王文珊(2017)。壓瘡發生原因探討-以某地區醫院內科病房為例〔碩士論文,義守大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0074-1406201718444900

延伸閱讀