透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.133.147.87
  • 學位論文

ViPR 複合式訓練對於軀幹穩定肌群與四肢肌力、身體適能之影響

The effects of ViPR complex training on core stability, limb strength, and physical fitness

指導教授 : 吳汶蘭

摘要


本研究目的在探討從事新式ViPR系統訓練六週後,對於軀幹核心穩定肌群和四肢肌力以及相關身體適能的影響,並與一般傳統阻力訓練效益之比較。方法是招募23位world gym的會員為研究對象,將其分為ViPR訓練組 (實驗組)11名及一般阻力訓練WT組(對照組)12名。ViPR組平均年齡37.27(11.54)歳、身高166.44(7.65)公分;一般阻力訓練WT組的平均年齡36(12.56)歲、身高167.75(8.74)公分,個別前測完成後,進行為期6週、每週2次、每次60分鐘的ViPR訓練課程或一般阻力訓練課程,再於六週訓練後施予後測。所得數據使用成對樣本、獨立樣本丅檢定與單因子共變量數變異數分析來進行統計分析。,以P<.05為顯著水準,分析不同的訓練方式對身體組成、核心穩定、1RM肌力、肌耐力、爆發力、平衡性、全身柔軟度等測量之影響。研究結果:於6週ViPR組和WT組兩組體能訓練後,兩組在身體組成含蛋白質、骨骼肌、基礎代謝率,以及核心穩定性、右旋轉柔軟度、左旋轉柔軟度,皆有顯著差異(P<.05),ViPR組皆優於WT組。結論:本研究之6週ViPR訓練對於軀幹核心肌群的部份與柔軟度以及身體組成上是有顯著提升,但在於四肢肌力、肌耐力、爆發力等項目並不比一般阻力訓練來的明顯較好,但兩組皆有明顯進步, 6週後無明顯差異。

並列摘要


Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of 6 months of the newly launched ViPR training method on core strength/stability, limb strength and physical fitness, in comparison to the conventional weight training programmers in popular use Method: 23 World Gym members were enrolled for this study, 11 in the ViPR group (study group) and 12 in the Weight Training group (control group). The average age and height of the study and control subjects are as follows: the average age was 37.27(11.54) years old and the average height was 166.44 (7.65) cm for the study group; control group had an average age of 36 (12.56) years and height 167.75 (8.74) cm. Before training, individual pre-test was finished. The duration of the weight and ViPR training is over 6 weeks with two sessions weekly and each session lasting 60 minutes. Post-test was performed after 6 weeks. Paired samples t-test, independent t- test and ANCOVA were used in this study, P <.05 was set as the level of significance, The study parameters include training effects on body composition, core muscle stability, 1RM muscle strength, muscular endurance, muscle power, balance, and flexibility of the body. Results: After 6 weeks of weight training and ViPR training, there are statistically significant differences (P <.05) on body composition containing protein mass, skeletal muscle mass, basal metabolic rate, and core muscle stability, right and left rotation flexibility. ViPR group was significantly better than the weight training group. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the improvement of core muscle strength and flexibility after ViPR training was more obvious than the weight training, however, limb muscle strength, muscle endurance, muscle power were not markedly different from conventional weight training. We suspect that is probably because these two training methods are both effective in improving limb muscle strength.

參考文獻


1. 劉雅甄 and 王泠, 藥球訓練之理論與實務. 教練科學, 2003(2): p. 221-228.
2. 楊明達 and 詹貴惠, 藥球訓練對上半身肌力的影響. 大專體育學刊, 2006. 8(2): p. 187-193.
3. 鄭景峰, 增強式訓練的理論與應用. 中華體育第 16 卷第一期, 2002: p. 36-45.
4. 楊明達 and 詹貴惠, 增強式訓練的效果與應用. 大專體育, 2005(81): p. 37-44.
5. Akuthota, V. and S.F. Nadler, Core strengthening. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2004. 85(3 Suppl 1): p. S86-92.

延伸閱讀