臺南市農業用地違規使用之研究

A Study of Illegal Use of Farmland in Tainan

董章芬(Chen-Fen Done)

指導教授 ： 張慈佳

長榮大學/管理學院/土地管理與開發學系(所)/碩士(2016年)

摘要

民國89年修正通過的農業發展條例在農地政策產生重大變革，將過去『農地農有與農地農用』的政策調整為『放寬農地農有、落實農地農用』。行政院農業委員會依農業發展條例2000年第8條之一第三項定之，訂定申請農業用地作農業設施容許使用審查辦法（以下簡稱申請農業設施），就農業設施用地範圍、農業設施種類、農業設施申請書及檢附資料、農業設施占坐落地總面積比、作業程序…等，作為農地管理依據。
雖然申請農業設施辦法經過92、98、102、104年5次修正，但修正過程是以：「納入新產業觀念與作法、允許邊際農地多元利用」、「簡化審查事項，符合簡政便民」及「強化農業設施之稽查與管理」等面向之增修訂作業。然而利用本審查辦法農地違規使用已是全國性的問題，新購買農地之自然人馬上利用本審查辦法申請農業設施，事後違規比率高達八成，可知本審查辦法制定有欠缺嚴謹是主要原因。
本研究結果為導正此一亂象，利用本審查辦法申請農業設施時需有資格之限制及稽查要列冊追蹤、持續加倍開罰，讓違規成本大於違規利益才能遏止此一亂象，以維全民農地農用最大利益。

關鍵字

申請農業用地作農業設施容許使用審查辦法 ； 農地管理 ； 農業設施 ； 農地違規

並列摘要

The Agricultural Development Act amended in 2000 made significant changes in agricultural policy. It changed from『farmland owned by farmer and farmland used exclusively for agriculture』policy to『relaxation of farmland owned by farmer and improve implementation of farmland used exclusively for agriculture』policy. According to Art.8.1(3) of Agricultural Development Act, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan enacted Regulation for approval of agriculture facilities on farmland（hereinafter referred to as application for agriculture facilities）.It specified farmland applicable category 、agriculture facilities types、application forms and data attached、facilities building coverage ratio、operating procedures、…and so on, to be farmland administrative basis.
Although the Regulation experienced 5 times amendments through 2003 to 2015. It was revised in the direction of 「Fitting into new industrial concept and practice、allowing multivariate use of marginal farmland」、「simplifying review items, conforming to facilitate administration for people’s convenience」and 「strengthening inspection and administration of agriculture facilities」. However irregular use of farmland had been a countrywide issue. New purchase farmland personal owner took advantage of the Regulation to apply for agriculture facilities approval just wanting irregular use. This problem had spread all over the country and consequent irregular use ratio had reached 80 percent. The major cause was short of strict legislation of the Regulation as we knew﹒
This study result demonstrated that the only way of correcting irregular use of farmland is tracking blacklist 、 continuing cumulative penalty 、 setting higher threshold for applicants and consequently making violation penalty greater than violation reward to stop irregular use of farmland. Then approached all nations’ best benefit of farmland used for agriculture。

並列關鍵字

Regulation for approval of agriculture facilities constructed on farmland ； farmland administration ； agriculture facilities ； irregular use of farmland

參考文獻

4.王俊豪（2008）安全農業與農地永續利用整合機制之探討－以歐盟為例。臺灣農學會報，9（2）：151-170

5.行政院（2014）回函監察院：本院農業委員會迄未建立農業用地總量管制機制案。

6.李承嘉、廖麗敏、陳怡婷、王玉真、藍逸之（2009）。多功能農業體制下的農地功能與使用方案選擇。臺灣土地研究；12（2）：135-162

10.吳功顯（2007）臺灣農業政策對農地利用之影響。華岡農科學報19，P31-57。

12.吳彩珠、林峰田、林森田、許元綸（2013）宜蘭農地宅舍分布型態之變遷與其影響因素之探討？都市與計畫40（1），P31-57。