受暴婦女對修復式正義司法處遇之觀點

Restorative justice: Subjective experiences of women who were victims of violence

王玲琇(Ling-Hsiu Wang)

指導教授 ： 卓春英

長榮大學/人文社會學院/社會工作研究所/碩士(2013年)

https://doi.org/10.6833/CJCU.2013.00236

摘要

中文摘要
本研究主要目的是瞭解受暴婦女對於修復式正義司法處遇的主要觀點。從此觀點出發來呈現她們的意見與想法，希望由下而上的聲音對於未來建構修復式正義司法處遇模式時，能回應及理解受暴婦女們的經驗。研究對象為十位受婚姻暴力的婦女，在研究方法的選擇上，採取質性研究的焦點團體及深度訪談方法，作為主要資料分析來源。
經研究發現可分為以下四部份說明：一、受暴婦女對傳統司法的印象：二、受暴婦女在傳統司法遭遇的困境：三、受暴婦女對修復式正義的看法：四、受暴婦女對修復式正義的期待。本研究發現受暴婦女認為「傳統司法」高高在上、遙不可及，對法庭及法官的權威以及警政的不友善態度，都讓他們感到恐懼、孤立、無助，傳統司法無法貼近她們的生命經驗與感受，更難以為她們發聲。而對於「修復式正義」受訪婦女認為這是有別於傳統司法的另一種途徑，採支持觀點的受訪婦女表示：修復式正義讓她們有勇氣去面對問題、透過中立的第三人雙方能好好地解決問題，經由充分溝通與對話，化解衝突、斷裂，撫平傷害，縮短訴訟時間也為暴力設下停損點，並且能協調夫妻的感情給孩子一個完整的家；另外，採不支持觀點的受訪婦女則認為修復式正義不能發揮實質功用，易流於形式和白費心力，或已錯過協調時機。然而，她們對修復式正義司法都有共同的期待：希望受暴及加害的雙方都能共同參與修復式正義，因為婚姻是夫妻雙方的事，只有一方的意願無法解決問題；參與修復式正義的促進者要公平客觀，並以安全及尊重為首要考量；有嚴重暴力及外遇對象者不宜進入修復式正義；最後建議進行修復式正義司法處遇時要增加社工的陪伴和參與。
「修復式正義」運用在婚姻暴力仍有不少爭議，因為修復式正義尚在起步階段，極需各專業有高度的共同認知及網絡的合作才有助於執行的效益，基於研究發現，研究者對政策倡導者、學術教育者、實務工作者及未來研究提出建議。
關鍵字：受暴婦女、修復式正義

關鍵字

受暴婦女 ； 修復式正義

並列摘要

Abstract
The main purpose of this study is to understand the main point of the battered women case for restorative justice Justice Branch. From this point of view to present their views and ideas, and hope that the bottom-up sound for the future construction of restorative justice Justice Branch case mode, able to respond to and understand their experience of battered women. The object of study for ten women take qualitative research, focus groups and depth interviews as the main source of data analysis, the choice of research methods, marital violence.
Findings can be divided into the following four parts: Description of a battered women the impression of the traditional justice: battered women in view of the plight of the traditional judicial encountered: battered women restorative justice: four by violence women's expectations of restorative justice. The study found that battered women that "traditional justice" lofty, distant, unfriendly attitude of the authority of the courts and judges, as well as policing, fear, isolation, helplessness, traditional justice can not be close to their life experience and feelings, it is more difficult to think that they sound. The women interviewed for "restorative justice" think this is another way that is different from the traditional justice, mining support the point of view of the women interviewed said: restorative justice so that they have the courage to face the problem, through a neutral third party both sides can take to solve the problem through full communication and dialogue to resolve the conflict, fracture, heal injuries, shorten processing times and set a stop-loss point for violence, and to coordinate the feelings of the couple's give the child a complete home; addition, mining The women interviewed do not support the view that restorative justice can not play a real function, the easy formality and vain effort, or have missed the coordination timing. However, they have common expectations of restorative justice Judicial: I hope that the victims of violence and victimization of both sides to participate in restorative justice, because marriage is a matter of both spouses, only the party will not solve the problem; participate in restorative justice facilitator to be fair and objective, and the primary consideration to safety and respect; unfit for serious violence and having an affair with restorative justice; final recommendations Restorative Justice Justice Department case companionship and participation of social workers to increase.
The use of "restorative justice" because restorative justice is still in its infancy, there is still a lot of controversy in the marital violence in dire need of a high degree of common cognitive and network cooperation in various professional only contribute to the implementation of effective, based on the findings, the researchers policy advocates, academic educators, practitioners, and future research recommendations.
Keywords: battered women, restorative justice

並列關鍵字

battered women ； Restorative Justice

參考文獻

郭玲妃（2002）。雙重家鎖：受虐婦女的母職經驗。國立台灣大學社會學研究所

黃俊英（1994）。企業研究方法。台北：東華書局。

點探討緩起訴受處分人修復性影響因素之研究。《第三屆犯罪問題與對策研

高鳳仙（1998）。家庭暴力防治法規專論。台北：五南。

陳若璋（1992a）。台灣婚姻暴力之本質、歷程與影響，《婦女與兩性期刊》，3：