透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.222.158.1
  • 學位論文

痛心詩派的誕生: 論台灣現代詩在社群網站時代的類型化現象(2011-2019)

The Arise of ”The Depressing Poets”: a Study of Subgenre Development of Taiwanese Modern Poetry in Social Network Age (2011-2019)

指導教授 : 李癸雲

摘要


自2016年開始,博客來、誠品等書籍通路的年度報告,甚至是國立臺灣文學館出版的《2017臺灣文學年鑑》內的〈現代詩概述〉,都指出宋尚緯、徐珮芬等青年詩人在社群網站受到歡迎,其詩集也越來越暢銷。到2018年,《幼獅文藝》等文學雜誌做專題探討文學在網路傳播的現象(包含詩在臉書上的傳播),《遠見》雜誌更做相關報導,其標題為〈台灣現代詩迎來「文藝復興」時代〉,這篇報導卻引發廖偉棠、沈眠等詩人不滿,在詩壇引起「晚安詩論戰」,使讀詩粉專「晚安詩」受到一定影響,也使報導內被提及的詩人受到一定批評。 前述年度報告、年鑑、報導皆指出這些受到歡迎的詩人們,如宋尚緯、徐珮芬等,在詩作主題上以人生痛苦為主。他們寫詩不僅為了自癒,也是希望以詩癒人。他們詩風轉變、詩觀變化,乃至於受到讀者歡迎,都是在接近時間點發生的集體現象,顯示應受到類似的背景因素影響。由於他們在詩觀、主題、詩風上有一定類似之處,因此本文想透過類型小說研究的「類型化」觀點,重新檢視並理解文本的類似處、作者與讀者取得文本詮釋共識——自癒,並且癒人——的過程,乃至於共同的背景因素。 本文以葉青、任明信、宋尚緯、徐珮芬為研究對象,指出他們的詩風與詩觀變化,PTT詩版與臉書等媒介上的讀者回應,以及在這些階段背後的媒介、社會、組織因素如何影響作者、讀者與類型發展。本文將類型化過程分為三個階段:2011-2013年、2013-2015年、2015-2018年,以便呈現「痛心詩派」作為詩類型的發展過程,並探討「晚安詩論戰」背後的詩觀、產銷體系等衝突,以便釐清論戰發生的原因,並在結論處補上2018-2019年的類型相關發展。

並列摘要


From 2016, the annual reports of book sales channels such as Books.com.tw(博客來), Eslite Bookstore(誠品書局), and even “The general description of modern poetry” in The Almanac of Taiwan Literature 2017 published by National Museum of Taiwan Literature pointed out that young poets like Song Shang-Wei, Hsu Pei-Fen have become popular in the SNS (Social Network Site), and their poetry have become good seller. In 2018, some literature magazines lite Youth Literary(幼獅文藝) made the topic of literature transmission in the SNS, including Facebook, then Global View Magazine(遠見雜誌) made a report “The Renaissance Era of Taiwanese Poetry is coming.” But some Poets like Liu Wai-Tong and Shen Mian resented this report, and the controversy called “The Good Night Poem Controversy” (晚安詩論戰) happened, which affected the poem sharing fan page “The Good Night Poem” and poets mentioned in the report. All previous reports pointed out the main themes of those popular poets’ poem, like Song Shang-Wei, Hsu Pei-Fen, are the depression of life. Those poets wrote poems for curing not only themselves but readers. The time they change of their style and perspective of poetry, and even they became popular were close, which represented these changes were collective phenomena and probably influenced by similar background factors. Due to the similarity of those poets’ perspective, main theme, and style of poetry, this thesis would inspect and clarify the similarity of their texts, the progress that the authors and readers reach the consensus of interpretation of the texts, which is curing the author’s self then curing the reader, and the common background factors by the perspective of subgenre development by novel subgenre study. This thesis took Ye Qing, Ren Ming-Xin, Song Shang-Wei and Hsu Pei-Fen as the researched poets to point out the changes of their style and perspective of poetry, and how the medium, social and (literature) organization factors influence the authors, readers and the subgenre development. This thesis divided the progress of this subgenre development into 3 phases: 2011-2013, 2013-2015, 2015-2018, to reveal the development progress of “The Depressing Poets” as a subgenre of poetry. This thesis also investigated the conflicts of perspective of poetry and the system of production and sales behind “The Good Night Poem Controversy” to clarify its causes and add the development after the controversy in 2018-2019 in the conclusion.

參考文獻


一、研究對象發表作品
(一)著作
1. 任明信,《你沒有更好的命運》(台北市:黑眼睛文化,2013.08)。
2. 任明信,《光天化日》(台北市:黑眼睛文化,2015.08)。
3. 任明信,《別人》(台北市:大田,2017.06)。

延伸閱讀