Previous studies of the correction processes tried to interpret the correcting direction. Set-reset theory (Martin 1986) described how people corrected their judgments from initially perceived assimilation to contrast. Wegener’s study ( Wegener 1993) further extended the correction scenario from initially perceived assimilation to initially perceived contrast. In recent years, product endorsers have been universally adopted in marketing. However, when a very attractive and popular endorser has been intensively exposed on mass product advertisements, consumers' impressions on the endorsed product might be less likely to be positively assimilated than when the same endorser endorsed products less frequently. In this study, we were going to find the factors that could influence consumers’ attitudes in endorsed products. And, how is the magnitude of their attitude correction in different conditions if the same endorser endorsed products intensively in a very short time. In this study, some factors that might influence the magnitude of correction will be identified and explored. These important factors may include high/low consumer perceived risk and strong/weak advertisement argument about products. In addition, the condition under which overcorrection is more likely to occur will be further examined in this study. A two (perceived risk: high/low) by two(argument quality: strong/weak ), and by two (number of products endorsed by the endorser) factorial design will be applied in this study. This study will provide a new insight on understanding under which conditions consumers will be more likely to correct the perceived biases by themselves. When making marketing strategy, marketers should be aware of the potential negative effect of applying endorsers to convince their customers buying products, especially when the same endorser is repeatedly exposed in a short interval of various product advertisements.