附加問題結合圖形組織對提升閱讀理解層次的效果

The Effects of Adjunctive Questions Combined with Graphic Organizers to Enhance Reading Comprehension Level

黃馨慧(Hsin-hui Huang)

指導教授 ： 曾正宜

國立清華大學/其它/學習科學研究所/碩士(2012年)

摘要

本研究旨在探究附加問題結合圖形組織對提升四年級學童在故事體文章閱讀理解層次的成效，並了解閱讀理解策略教學對不同閱讀理解能力學生的影響，以供教師在閱讀活動教學之參考。
本研究對象為研究者所任教的新竹縣某國小四年級學童，採準實驗研究，包含「實驗組一」25人，分四週依序進行「AQ」、「AQ+教師建立GO」、「AQ」以及「逆向AQ+學生建立GO」閱讀理解鷹架教學活動；「實驗組二」26人，分四週依序進行「AQ+教師建立GO」、「AQ」、「AQ+學生建立GO」以及「順向AQ+學生建立GO」閱讀理解鷹架教學活動。教學實驗前兩組皆以「閱讀理解困難篩選測驗」區分高、低閱讀理解能力學生，並施以「PIRLS閱讀理解測驗」前測，再以此分數為共變數，進行「2（不同閱讀理解鷹架）×2（閱讀理解能力）二因子共變數分析」，在每一次教學實驗處理後，分析兩組學生在「PIRLS閱讀理解測驗」後測表現的差異情形，全部教學實驗結束後，以「閱讀理解鷹架教學意見自評量表」，探討兩組學生對附加問題結合圖形組織教學的學習成效與接受度之想法。
依據資料分析與研究結果,本研究的主要發現如下:
1.「AQ」與「AQ+教師建立GO」兩種教學對學生在「PIRLS閱讀理解測驗」表現無顯著差異。
2.接受「AQ+學生建立GO」教學學生在「PIRLS閱讀理解測驗」表現顯著高於接受「AQ」教學學生。「AQ+學生建立GO」組低閱讀理解能力學生在直接理解歷程表現顯著高於「AQ」組。
3.接受「逆向AQ+學生建立GO」教學學生在「PIRLS閱讀理解測驗」表現顯著高於接受「順向AQ+學生建立GO」教學學生。「逆向AQ+學生建立GO」組高閱讀理解能力學生在直接與詮釋理解歷程表現顯著高於「順向AQ+學生建立GO」組。
4.不同閱讀理解鷹架教學對高低閱讀理解能力學生「PIRLS閱讀理解測驗」表現無顯著差異。
5.學生對附加問題結合圖形組織教學持正向反應，認為對閱讀理解能力有助益。

關鍵字

圖形組織 ； 附加問題 ； 閱讀理解

並列摘要

The purpose of this study is to discuss the effects of adjunctive questions combined with graphic organizers to enhance the fourth grade students’ reading comprehension level on narrative texts, and to examine the influence on students with different reading comprehension ability, then to give suggestions for future instruction and future research.
The sample consisted of 51 fourth-graders that the researcher teaches in Hsinchu County. The experimental group 1 was 25 students, who received「AQ」,「AQ+ Teacher-constructed GO」,「AQ」and「AQ+Backward- constructed GO」reading-comprehension-scaffold instruction in order. The experimental group 2 was 26 students, who received「AQ+ Teacher-constructed GO」, 「AQ」,「AQ+Matching GO」and「AQ+Forward- constructed GO」reading-comprehension-scaffold instruction in order. All the subjects took the pretest of “PIRLS Reading Comprehension Test＂and the posttest of “PIRLS Reading Comprehension Test＂after every experiment. Before the experiment, both groups had carried out “Reading Comprehension Difficulties in Screening Tests” to distinguish the levels of text comprehension. Two-way ANCOVA by “PIRLS Reading Comprehension Test” pretest scores as the covariates were conducted for data analysis. After the experiment, all the subjects took a questionnaire on their learning feedback following the end of the experiment.
The findings were as follows:
1.「AQ」and「AQ+ Teacher-constructed GO」instruction didn’t show any significant difference on the posttest scores of “PIRLS Reading Comprehension Test＂.
2.The students who received 「AQ+Matching GO」instruction demonstrated a higher scores than 「AQ」, and they had significant differences, especially for the students with low reading comprehension performed in the direct comprehension processes.
3.The students who received「AQ+Backward- constructed GO」instruction demonstrated a higher scores than「AQ+Forward- constructed GO」instruction , and they had significant differences, especially for the students with high reading comprehension.
4.Students at various levels of reading comprehension ability didn’t demonstrated significant differences on the posttest scores of “PIRLS Reading Comprehension Test＂.
5. Most students thought that the adjunctive questions combined with graphic organizers instruction was helpful to their reading comprehension.

並列關鍵字

graphic organizers ； adjunctive questions ； reading comprehension

參考文獻

王文科 (2006)。《課程與教學論》。台北：五南出版社。

王開府（2008）。〈心智圖與概念模組在語文閱讀與寫作思考教學之運用〉。《國文學報》，43，263-296。

江淑卿、郭生玉（1997）。〈不同學習過程的概念構圖策略對促進知識結構專家化與理解能力之效果研究〉。《師大學報》，42，1-16。

林達森(2005)。〈不同導入訓練歷程之「概念構圖教學法」對國小階段生物能量概念學習與態度影響之實徵研究〉。《高雄師大學報》，19，105-122。

吳裕聖、曾玉村（2011）。〈鷹架式概念構圖教學策略對學童生物文章的閱讀表徵與情意之影響〉。《國立臺灣師範大學教育心理學報》，43 (1)，1-24。