透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.140.186.201
  • 學位論文

飛盤運動與對抗性運動在道德解離與運動員精神之差異研究

A Study on the Differences between Moral Disengagement on and Sportspersonship in Frisbee and Contact Sport Athletes.

指導教授 : 高三福

摘要


本研究主要目的在於探討飛盤運動與對抗性運動的選手在道德解離及運動員精神之間的差異為何,以大專公開組運動選手,其項目包含飛盤、籃球、橄欖球、手球、曲棍球,共218位研究對象,使用研究工具為「道德解離量表」與「運動員精神量表」。所取得資料以描述性統計、皮爾遜積差相關、單因子變異數及迴歸進行分析。研究結果顯示,不同項目對道德解離向度中,道德論證、委婉標示、優勢比對、責任轉移、結果扭曲、責備歸因、去人性化都有顯著的差異;不同項目對運動員精神向度中,尊重比賽禮儀、正面手段、堅持到底都有顯著的差異。根據研究結果,發現研究假設大致上都獲得支持,飛盤運動選手在道德解離方面皆低於其他對抗性運動選手,說明飛盤運動選手在運動表現時,比其他項目選手更不容易產生道德解離。

關鍵字

道德解離 運動員精神 飛盤

並列摘要


This study aims to analyze the difference between the moral disengagement and the sportsmanship among Division I Collegiate Athletes of frisbee. The Moral Disengagement Meter and the Sportsmanship Meter are applied to implement this study of 218 research participants who are none other than players of frisbee, basketball, rugby, handball, and hockey. Data obtained from those participants are thereby put into analyses of Descriptive Statistics, Pearson’s Correlation, One-Way ANOVA, and Multiple Regression. The study first shows that different types of sports demonstrate apparent differences among factors like moral justification, euphemistic labeling, advantageous comparison, displacement of responsibility, diffusion of responsibility, distortion of consequences, attribution of blame, and dehumanization. Likewise, players of those sports mentioned above then perform with obvious differences in respect to courtesy, negative tactics, and perseverance in sportsmanship dimensions. In our finding, the initial hypothesis of this study can be confirmed: frisbee players are less likely to be morally disengaged in relation with players of other combatant sports. That is, frisbee players are more morally engaged than players of other sports.

並列關鍵字

Moral disengagement Sportsmanship Frisbee

參考文獻


王文君、陳張榮(2013)。全民運動會比賽項目-飛盤介紹。體育學報,23,61-72。
王志全、甘裕意、高三福(2018)。體育學報,51(2),187-198。
王志全、高三福(2019)。超競爭人格與反社會行為之關係:道德解離的調節效果。中華民國體育學報,52(3),335-368。
甘裕意(2014)。運動道德解離對運動中利社會與反社會行為的影響:社會認同的調節作用。國立新竹教育大學。新竹市。
呂俊甫(1991)。發展心理與教育-全人發展與全人教育。台北:台灣商務印書館。

延伸閱讀