透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.138.105.124
  • 學位論文

測驗選題演算法之研究 —以國中基本學力測驗之國文.數學為例

Implementing a Test Item Selection Algorithm to Verbal and Math Tests

指導教授 : 謝財明 張淑慧
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究目的在於比較最大訊息法與模擬退火法的選題策略之成效,以隨機法為比較的基礎線,測驗資料來源為九十年度基本學力測驗國文與數學二科,國文科二次測驗與數學科二次測驗經由因素分析檢核,皆符合項目反應理論中單一向度的假設,由三參數模式分析測驗資料所得題目訊息量、鑑別度與難度輸入選題策略中,本研究採用兩種電腦適性測驗的終止標準:第一種終止標準是設定題數上下限和時間上下限,第二種終止標準是設定題數20題以內或標準誤0.4以內,而比較最大訊息法與退火法成效的依據是標準誤的大小。 在第一種終止標準下,退火法的結果都比最大訊息法與隨機法的標準誤小很多,在第二種終止標準下,除了第一次國文科退火法的標準誤較其他方法大一些之外,退火法所使用的題數較其他方法多一些,而標準誤卻遠比其他方法小很多。 本研究建議未來方向可以進一步比較退火法與基因演算法選題的成效,或者是依照各種能力分組來比較各種選題策略成效。

並列摘要


The purpose of the present study is to assess the effect of two item selection strategies. The two strategies are Max Information Method (MIM) and Simulated Annealing (SA). The random method (RM) is used as baseline for the comparison. The test data are the basic ability tests used for entrance examination for high schools. Two verbal tests and two mathematics tests are chosen for data analysis. The unidimensionality assumption is confirmed by factor analysis. The item response theory is applied to the test data. The item information, item discrimination and difficulty parameters resulted from the three-parameter model are implemented into computer program. There are two stopping rules for computerized adaptive testing process. First, there are lower and upper limits for test length and testing time. Secondly, the test length is less or equal to twenty items or standard error is less or equal to 0.4. The criteria for comparison is the size of standard error of estimates. The results show that under the first stopping rule, the standard error of SA is much smaller than MIM and RM for all the test data except one verbal test. Under the second stopping rule, the test length of SA is slightly longer than MIM and RM, however the standard error of SA is much smaller than the other two strategies. The future studies could compare SA and other strategies such as the genetic algorithm. The comparison could also be made on different ability groups to assess the generalization of the conclusion of present study.

參考文獻


[21]黃盟惠、張淑慧,”項目反應理論應用於學業性向測驗之可行性探討,”中原學報,第24卷,第二期,5-12頁,民85.
[1]林世華,”潛在特質理論與其應用與適性測驗之評估研究”,國立台灣師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文,民75.
[23]Cattell, R. B. “The screen test for the number of factors.” Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, pp. 245-276,1966.
[25]Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. “Item response theory: Principles and applications.” Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.,1983.
[27] Kirkpatrick, S., C. D. Gelatt, Jr. and M. P. Vecchi, "Optimization by Simulated Annealing," Science, vol. 220, pp.671-680, 1983.

被引用紀錄


張育瑋(2003)。以知識地圖為基礎發展的遠距測驗選題策略〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu200300627
歐順德(2006)。廣義隱藏式馬可夫模型與核平滑化無參數試題反應理論整合模式之蒙地卡羅模擬研究〔碩士論文,亞洲大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0118-0807200916282521
郭昭麟(2009)。試題擴增動態約簡演算法〔碩士論文,亞洲大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0118-1511201215465397

延伸閱讀