由於過去在營利事業之財務危機研究中指出以傳統財務性指標建立財務危機預警模型,可以獲得良好之危機預警模型。本研究將這樣之研究結果用在屬於非營利性質之學校上,觀察學校之財務性指標是否也如營利事業研究結果一樣對於危機預警模型具有區別能力。本研究是以1999年至2001年間,曾遭教育部接管或是凍結補助款之私立大學院校為問題學校,並以學校規模、組織型態以及系所類別等條件以1:3之配對方式選取出正常學校,在採因素以及非因素分析法下利用Logit建立財務危機預警模型。 研究結果顯示,在接管當年以及前一年問題學校之行政管理支出佔總收入之比率顯著高於正常學校,且機械儀器設備佔固定資產之比率以及圖書及博物佔固定資產之比率均顯著低於正常學校。且無論採因素分析或是不採因素分析法下,接管當年之正確區別率達85﹪以上,接管前一年之正確區別率達82.5﹪以上,足以了解即使是屬於非營利性質之學校用財務變數所建立出之財務危機預警模型仍具有區別能力。
According to previous studies on financial distress of profit business pointed out that financial ratios made the construction of financial distress model could obtain excellent financial distress predicting model .This study will observe college’s and universities’ financial ratios made the construction of financial distress model can get the same result as profit business.Private colleges and universities that have been temporarily removed their management right by the Department of Education or have not been distributed any budget from the Government during 1999 and 2001 are identified as ‘abnormal school’. and using a 1:3 matched design choses the normal schools in the term of the scale of them、the style of them and what segment it is.Using factor analysis method and non-factor analysis method to establish the logit model . The empirical result show that the ratio of administration expense division total revenue is very different between normal and abnormal schools.And the ratios of equipments division fixed assets and the library’s assets division fixed assets in the normal schools are obviously higher than abnormal schools.And whether using factor or non-factor method ,the predict ability is very good.In the conclusion , financial ratios made the construction of financial distress model could obtain excellent financial distress predicting model even in non-profit business.