- 學位論文
桃園縣資源班與普通班教師情緒智力與對學生問題行為容忍度之關係研究
The Correlation between Emotional Intelligence and Tolerance of Students’ Problem Behavior for Resource Room Teachers and Regular Classroom Teachers in Tao-yuan County
摘要
本研究採用調查研究法，旨在探討不同背景的桃園縣國小資源班與普通班教師之情緒智力對問題行為容忍度之關係。以桃園縣公立國小的141位資源班教師與159位普通班教師為研究對象。研究工具為「教師情緒智力與對問題行為容忍度量表」，所蒐集的資料採取描述統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析和皮爾遜積差相關進行統計分析。本研究的主要發現如下: 一、桃園縣國小資源班與普通班教師的情緒智力屬中上程度。 二、桃園縣國小資源班與普通班教師的情緒智力沒有顯著差異。 三、桃園縣國小資源班與普通班教師對學生問題行為容忍度偏中低程度，但經鑑定確認學生為身心障礙學生，則教師會提高對其問題行為的容忍度。 四、 資源班教師對學生問題行為容忍度高於普通班教師。 五、 桃園縣國小資源班與普通班教師的情緒智力與對問題行為容忍度呈現部份相關。 根據研究結論，提出具體建議，以供教育行政機關、學校行政及未來研究的參考。
並列摘要
The current study used a survey to explore the correlation of emotional intelligence and tolerance for the problem behaviors toward various backgrounds among the Resource Room Teachers and Regular Classroom Teachers in Taoyuan County. The subjects of the study were 141 Regular Classroom Teachers and 159 Resource Room Teachers. The data was gathered through the “Teacher’s emotional intelligence and tolerance for the problem behavior survey”. The following statistical analyses were used: descriptive statistics, T- test, one-way ANOVA and Pearson correlations. The findings of the study were as following: 1. The Resource Room Teachers and the Regular Classroom Teachers in Taoyuan County showed above the middle level of emotional intelligence in this study. 2. No difference was found in Resource Room Teachers’ and Regular Classroom Teachers’ emotional intelligence in Taoyuan County. 3. The Resource Room Teachers and the Regular Classroom Teachers in Taoyuan County manifested a middle-to-low tolerance toward the problem Behaviors of the students. If Students have been identified as physical or mental impaired, teachers could increase their tolerance. 4. The Resource Room Teachers have more tolerance for the problem behavior than Regular Classroom Teachers. 5. A positive correlation was noted between the emotional intelligence of Resource Room Teachers and Regular Classroom Teachers in Taoyuan County and their tolerance toward the problem behavior of the students. Further suggestions for education authorities, school administration, and future research are given from the findings of the study.