高達美《真理與方法》之問答對話及其於教育之省思

The Dialogue of Questions & Answers in Gadamer’s Truth and Method and Its Application in Education

陳佳蕙(Chia-Hui Chen)

指導教授 ： 陸敬忠

中原大學/人文與教育學院/宗教研究所/碩士(2011年)

https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201100224

摘要

本文旨在探討高達美問答對話理論中的脈絡與意涵，反思理解與教育相輔相成之處。高達美在著作《真理與方法》中雖致力於藝術、歷史及語言的研究，但其在教學中實踐其理論的示範行動，使我們明白哲學詮釋學是可以實踐於教育，這點對教育工作者具有重要啟發意義。
　　問答邏輯是高達美詮釋學理論的一個重要概念，也是貫穿全書的一條線。詮釋學經驗的歷史性和開放性決定了其內在邏輯不是封閉自給的，它是在理解者和文本的問答對話過程中不斷走向新的經驗。從高達美對「蘇格拉底對話」和「科林伍德問與答的邏輯」的探討，使我們知道：理解的本性像對話一般，是問題與答案之間的一種交談。任何陳述都是對某個問題的回答，而提出正確的問題，是使對話得以順利完成、達到理解的關鍵。問與答對話過程中，理解者與被理解者的視域進行交互往返溝通的視域融合，最後達到相互理解與自我理解的境界。

關鍵字

高達美、理解、問答、問與答的辯證、對話、問答對話、教育

並列摘要

Abstract
In this thesis, I’ll discussion the context and meaning of Hans Georg Gadamer's theory of the Dialogue in questions & answers and reflect how understanding and education complement each other.In Gadamer’s "Truth and Method ", it emphasized art, history and language studies. But the teaching of his theory of the model action, we can realize the practice of philosophical hermeneutics in education, and this is could enlight educators instructive.
The logic of question and answer is an important concept in Gadamer’s hermeneutics theory and it’s the main concept in this book. The historical and open characteristics of hermeneutics experience defined its internal logic. The internal logic is not a enclosed self-sufficiency system. It is in understanding the dialogue of question and answer and leads to new experiences. In Gadamer’s discussion of "Socratic dialogue"and"Collingwood’s the logic of question and answer"let us know: The nature of understand is the same as dialogue. It is a conversation between he questions and answers. Any statement in an issue is the answer. Bt asking the right questions could lead the dialogueand and resuits in understanding. In the question and answer process, the horizon of the understanding-being and the horizon of the one being understood interact with each other, then the come up with an agreement and they both achieve mutual understanding and self-understanding.

Keywords: Gadamer, understanding, question and answer, the logical theory of question and answer, dialogic, the dialogue of questions & answers, Education

並列關鍵字

question and answer ； the logical theory of question and answer ； understanding ； Gadamer ； dialogic ； the dialogue of questions & answers ； Education

參考文獻

______.Richard E.，〈哲學詮釋學I：早期海德格，以及施萊爾瑪赫和狄爾泰的初步回顧〉，李佳馨譯，《哲學與文化》，第35卷第二期（2008.02），45-68頁。

吳澤玫，〈高達美論本文意義與詮釋者的關係〉，《哲學與文化》，第31卷第7期，（2004.07）。

呂健吉，〈柏拉圖對話篇中的哲學諮商－以《斐多篇》為例探討蘇格拉底對話模式與助人技巧〉，《哲學與文化》34卷1期 (2007/01)，31-52頁。

李文富，〈海德格的詮釋現象學及其在教育學方法論的意函〉，《花蓮師院學報》，民92,16期，頁89-107。

施祐吉，〈從後現代的角度探討國小消失中的道德教育另一個影響因素—師資培育變遷〉，《慈濟大學教育研究學刊．第五期》，29-54。