個人化社會學習環境中進行解決問題活動對問題解決能力影響之實徵研究

An Empirical Study on the Effect of Problem-Solving Ability by doing Problem Solving Activities in the Social Learning Environment for Individuals

翁立遠(Li-Yuan Wung)

指導教授 ： 廖慶榮

中原大學/商學院/資訊管理研究所/碩士(2012年)

https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201200978

摘要

中文摘要
本研究主要是以個人化社會學習環境iSocial為平台，透過解決問題的教學活動設計，讓學習者參與問題解決能力的活動，進而提高學生的問題解決能力及思考與邏輯能力，本研究以桃園縣某高中資料處理科學生為研究對象，透過參與實驗的活動，進行八週的教學活動，實驗結束後以問卷、訪談的方式蒐集資料，再針對這些資料加以分析與探討，藉此來探究活動對於問題解決能力及思考與邏輯能力的影響。本研究發現如下：
1. 活動對於問題解決能力有正面的影響。
2. 活動對於思考能力與邏輯能力有正面的影響。同時部份的受訪者認為活動可提昇想像力、創造力以及組織力。部份受訪者參與活動前後對於活動的看法有所改變，並認同活動對於問題解決能力的提昇有所幫助。

關鍵字

問題解決 ； 個人化社會學習環境 ； 數位學習 ； 社交學習2.0

並列摘要

Abstract
The purpose of this study is to improve learners’ abilities in problem-solving, thinking, and logic, and the study focuses on personal social learning environment. Learners participated in activities which were based on the design of problem-solving teaching activities. The participants were senior high students in Taoyuan County, and they took an eight-week experimental activity. The data were collected through questionnaires and interviews after the experiment. The effects of the experimental activity were analyzed and discussed in this research:
1. The activities had positive effects on learners’ problem-solving ability.
2. The activities had positive effects on learners’ thinking and logical abilities. Some of the participants also thought that the activities can enhance imagination, creativity, and organizing skills, and some had different opinions after participating in the activity and agreed with the help of the problem-solving activities.

並列關鍵字

Social Learning 2.0 ； personal social learning environment ； e-Learning ； problem-solving

參考文獻

[10] 倪秋立、許麗玲（2009）。Web3.0的發展與對學習方法影響之探討。 生活科技教育, 42（6）, 35-43.

[5] 呂素雯（2002）。自然科創造性問題解決教學對國小六年級學童問題解決能力、態度及學習成就之影響研究。未出版碩士論文，國立台北師範學院，台北市。

[3] Dewey, J.（1910）.How we think.Boston：Heath.

[5] Hatch, L.（1988）： Problem Solving approach.Instructional Strategies for Technology Education.

[7] McClelland, D. C.（1973）. Testing for Competence rather than for "Intelligence". American Psychologist, 28, 1-14.