透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.222.108.18
  • 學位論文

非韌性鋼筋混凝土構造建築物之梁柱構件塑鉸性質推算及驗證

Modeling Parameters for Nonlinear Behavior of Members and Verification of Non-ductile Reinforced Concrete Buildings

指導教授 : 林炳昌

摘要


老舊建築物於設計時大多缺乏耐震設計觀念造成構件韌性能力不佳,例如箍筋為90度彎勾、梁柱接頭區無剪力筋、主筋搭接或錨定長度不足、梁柱構材端部箍筋間距太寬、混凝土強度不足或混凝土保護層厚度不夠等,產生構材韌性或強度不足之情形,容易發生脆性破壞。本文目的希望建立一套精確預測構材之塑性旋轉角值的方法,用於判斷結構物的韌性是否良好。因此以自行義之塑鉸值輸入SAP 2000作分析是相當重要的。對於鋼筋混凝土梁柱構材塑鉸值之計算是以Park【27】、Kawashima【14】及Mander【15】三個混凝土應力應變模式為基礎理論,各自發展出非線性分析程式以推算出梁、柱構材之彎矩-曲率關係,並使用不同方法將彎矩-曲率曲線雙線性化,再配合塑性旋轉角值及塑鉸長度之經驗公式求得塑鉸值,進而模擬梁柱構材之塑性行為。同時利用SAP2000之非線性推覆分析方法,求得建築物容量曲線並經由ATC-40所建議之容量譜法求得需求譜與容量譜的交點,推估老舊建築物之耐震能力以比較不同狀況下耐震能力之差異。

並列摘要


A lot of old buildings were designed without based on seismic requirement, thus they had not enough ductile ability for the buildings. Such as, transverse reinforcement was 90° hook, or beam-column connection was lack of shear reinforcement, or longitudinal reinforcement was spliced, or transverse reinforcement spacing was too large in the plastic hinge region of members, or concrete strength was poor and cover depth was not enough etc. These made members become less ductile ability and without enough strength, and caused brittle easily. The purpose of this research is to establish more precise predictable method of the plastic rotation angle value. And then we can judge further while the ductile ability is good or bad. Thus we use different stress-strain model to analyze and evaluate the moment-curvature curve of reinforced concrete members. And we try to get the curve linearity with different method. And then use the experience formula of plastic rotation value and plastic hinge to calculate plastic hinge value. Further more, we simulate the plastic behavior of members. At the same time, we concern nonlinear pushover analysis of SAP2000 to evaluate the capacity curve of the buildings, and also Use the result make intersections of the demand spectrum and the capacity spectrum by ATC-40 suggested method to estimated the difference the seismic evaluation of old buildings in the different situations.

參考文獻


4. 中華民國建築師公會全國聯合會,「九二一集集大地震震災調查建築物耐震能力評估修復補強專輯」,民國88年12月。
46. 「鋼筋混凝土建築物耐震能力評估法及推廣」,內政部建築研究所,民國88年12月。
6. Applied Technology Council(ATC), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Vol.1, ATC 40, Redwood City, CA,1996.
7. CSI, “SAP2000:Integrated Finite Element Analysis and Design of Structures”, Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkely,California,(1996).
8. Park. R and T. Paulay,“Reinforced concrete structures,” Deparament of civil engineering, University of Canterbury, christchurch, New Zealand.

被引用紀錄


洪季良(2008)。非線性推覆分析評估建築物耐震能力 與強度評估法之比較-消防隊案例〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu200900575
曾厚鈞(2009)。鋼筋混凝土建築物容量曲線之模擬分析與驗證〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu200900336
黃德治(2007)。實體鋼筋混凝土建築物之崩塌實驗模擬分析與驗證〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu200700115
岳吉剛(2007)。機關代辦建築工程專案管理招標文件品質影響發包進度之研究 -以營建署92~94年度代辦非全程建築工程專案管理為例-〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2007.10270

延伸閱讀