在地球資源有限的情形下,建築的永續發展是建築界所關注的焦點。可隨時間與使用機能做改變的「開放建築」,長久以來就一直被廣泛的討論。但,目前「開放建築」的研究多以同戶的彈性變化為主。本研究嘗試以設計實驗的方式探討跨越同一戶的彈性變化可能性,試圖達到跨越戶與戶之間彈性使用的目的。 設計實驗包含兩個階段:第一階段以四組居住單元為主,每組均有四戶,單純的討論戶與戶之間的彈性變化機制。設計實驗完成後,將四組居住單元作垂直整合,並就空間增長、動線系統、中介空間、底層關係檢討其最佳效益。第二階段的設計實驗以前階段之結果為基礎,修改單元平面,繼續進行跨越戶與戶間的彈性變化機制。此階段共分五組居住單元,既可水平組構為集合住宅,又能持續的垂直組合發展。 經由兩個階段的設計實驗後得知,欲使居住單元間能達到彈性變化,必須調整各單元內之空間序列(臥室與公共空間等)與單元及單元間之組構方式。主要結論有四: 1. 居住單元之彈性變化與單元的接觸面與採光面密切相關; 2. 居住單元內之空間序列直接影響彈性變化時空間增減的機會; 3. 戶與戶間之彈性變化,應先確定LDK(客廳、餐廳、廚房)位置之同層同軸原則; 4. 具半層差的居住單元可增加戶與戶間的接觸面,提高彈性增減的機會。
Under the premise of limited resources on Earth, sustainable development in buildings has become the focus in architecture. An “open architecture” that adapts to time and function has always been the topic of discussion. However, most of the recent studies on “open architecture” have solely focused on the flexible change within a dwelling unit. This study intents to explore the flexibilities between different dwelling units through design experiments, i.e. flexible spatial change between the units. The above mentioned design experiments consist of two phases: the first phase comprises of the generating of four groups of dwelling units, and brief discussions on the mechanism for the flexible change between the units. After that, these four groups of units are vertically integrated as a community complex. Then, the following 4 criterions about this complex are evaluated: the best effects between space expansion, circulation system, intermediary space and ground floor relationship. The results from the first phase of the design experiment are used as the basis for the second phase. With modified units, this study continues with the mechanism for the flexible change between the units. In the second stage, there are five groups of dwelling units generated that can be arranged both horizontally, as well as vertically to form a new community complex. After two stages of design experiments, this study shows that to achieve a successful flexible change between the units, one must adjust the spatial sequence within each unit, as well as the interfaces between the units. Further findings are as follows: 1. There is a close relationship between the flexible change of the dwelling units and their interfaces. 2. The spatial sequence of each unit has direct influence on the possibilities of the flexible changes of the units. 3. To guarantee a successful flexible change between the units, the location of the LDKs (living room, dining room and kitchen) should be preassigned at the same horizontal level, as well as on the same vertical axis. 4. The self-created half-story dwelling units increase the connection area between the units, thus improve the opportunity for flexible change.