利用聯想式推理作答對學生主動學習的影響

Effects of Associative Reasoning on Students’ Learning Performance

張佳瑋(Chia-Wei Chang)

指導教授 ： 鍾斌賢

中原大學/電機資訊學院/資訊工程研究所/碩士(2015年)

https://doi.org/10.6840/CYCU.2015.00486

摘要

近年來，隨著科技不斷的進步，許多伴隨著科技的輔助學習策略也不斷的產生，像是遊戲式學習(Game-Base Learning)以及行動學習(Mobile Learning)都是非常熱門的教學策略。
不論是遊戲式學習或建構在移動裝置上的學習，大部分只是外在包裝的不同，內容不外乎是重點提示或選擇題的方式。本研究提出「聯想式推理測驗」的方法，有別於一般選擇題，而是類似智力測驗的方式。「聯想式推理測驗」並沒有題目明確指出學生該如何作答，學生必須從四個選項中尋找關聯；並且沒有題目提示該如何選擇，學生必須透過思考及推理找到選項之間的關聯性，最後找出一個與其它選項沒有相關的選項。透過「聯想式推理測驗」的訓練，藉以提高學生主動思考及推理能力，加深學生學習的成效及學習記憶。
實驗結果顯示，學生在使用「聯想式推理測驗」的方式之後，對於課程內容有更詳細的了解，並且在後測學習成就上勝過沒有使用「聯想式推理測驗」的對照組。表示使用「聯想式推理測驗」能夠幫助學生學習、加深學習印象及達到複習學習內容的成果。

關鍵字

主動學習 ； 學習成就 ； 智力測驗 ； 推理作答 ； 聯想

並列摘要

During the past years, as technological rapid changes, many technology-assisted learning strategies have presented, such as Game-base learning and Mobile learning.
Almost all of game-based learning or mobile learning are only different from the package, but the contents are nothing more than highlights or multiple-choice questions. This study proposes the "Associative Reasoning" learning strategy, different from the general multiple choice there is no question instruct students how to answer. The students should find an association from four choice of options. Also there is no hits to suggest student how to choose, the students should find the correlation between options by Thinking and Reasoning. After all, the students find an option not associated with the other options. By using "Associative Reasoning" learning strategy to increase students’ active thinking and reasoning skills, further to enhance students' learning effectiveness and memory.
The findings indicate that, after the students use the "Associative Reasoning" approach, they are more understanding the course content, and have significant different than not use "Associative Reasoning" control group on the posttest learning achievement. The experiment results of this study shows that using the "Associative Reasoning" can help students learn more impression and enhance learning ability.

並列關鍵字

Active Learning ； Learning Achievement ； Intelligence Test ； Reasoning Question ； Association

參考文獻

1. Ahmed, S., Parsons, D. (2013). Abductive science inquiry using mobile devices in the classroom. Computers & Education, Volume 63, April 2013, Pages 62–72.

2. Baepler P., Walker J.D., Driessen M. (2014). It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, Volume 78, September 2014, Pages 227–236.

4. Baril, P. B., Cunningham, B. M., Fordham, D. R., Gardner, R. L., Wolcott, S. K. (1998). Critical thinking in the public accounting profession: aptitudes and attitudes. Journal of Accounting Education, 16 (£/4) (1998), pp. 381–406.

5. Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández-Ortega, B., Sese, F. J. (2013). Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Computers & Education, Volume 62, March 2013, Pages 102–110.

7. Bottino, R. M., Ferlino, L., Ott, M., Tavella, M. (2007). Developing strategic and reasoning abilities with computer games at primary school level. Computers & Education, Volume 49, Issue 4, December 2007, Pages 1272–1286.