公立中小學不適任教師之法制研究－以新教師法為中心

本研究旨在探討我國高級中等以下不適任教師的法制研究，並且是以2019年6月5日修正公布之教師法為中心。研究方法主要採取法規分析法、文件分析法及裁判分析法及社會研究法探討現行教師法下教師涉及「性平事件」、「行為違反相關法規，經有關機關查證屬實」及「教學不力或不能勝任工作」法制上處理的爭議，並且分析處理不適任教師之組織間關係，藉此提出結論供實務上處理不適任教師時作為參考。　　關於不適任教師常見類型之分析，本研究提出研究結論如下：1.性平事件之處理主管教育行政機關未統一訂定復議程序。2.行為違反相關法規認定標準仍過於空泛。3.教學不力或不能勝任工作之司法審查密度過低。　　有關不適任教師的組織分析，本研究提出研究結論如下：1.教評會處理特定不適任教師成員仍過於單一。2.專審會組成不夠專業多元。3.教評會與性平會的權限分工已有不同。4.教評會與專審會的關係仍具爭議。5.教評會與校事會議的關係仍不明確。　　本研究根據上述研究結論提出五項建議，分別為：1.主管教育行政機關應統一訂定「復議程序」。2.教師「行為違反相關法令」應限縮在教師義務之違反。3.法院對於教評會「教學不力或不能勝任工作」之決議應採全面審查。4.教評會審議涉及「行為違反相關法規」、「教學不力或不能勝任工作」之不適任教師時應增聘校外專家學者。5.專審會應減低教師會推派比例。

關鍵字

不適任教師；行為違反相關法規；教學不力或不能勝任工作；教師評審委員會；教師專業審查會

並列摘要

The purpose of this study is to explore the legal study of incompetent teachers in Public Elementary and High School in Taiwan, Centering on the Teacher Act revised on June 30, 2019.Researcher adopted law analysis,documentary analysis,judgment analysis and social research to analyze the legal dispute of teacher involved in “Gender Equity”,“The person has acted in Violation of any Pertinent Laws or Regulations , and the matter has been investigated and verified by the educational institution or the authorities concerned” and“Not Fulfilling a Teacher’s Duties, or being Incompetent to Teach” under the current Teacher Act. It also analyzes the Inter Organizational Relationship of dealing with the incompetent teachers, so as to put forward the conclusion for reference when dealing with the incompetent teachers in practice. Regarding the analysis of the common types of incompetent teachers, the main conclusions are as follows: 1. The handling of Gender Equity incidents has not uniformly established reconsideration procedures by education administration authority. 2. The standards of act in violation of any pertinent laws or regulations are still too vague. 3. On the standard of judicial review of not fulfilling a Teacher’s duties, or being incompetent to teach is too low. 　　As for the organizational analysis of incompetent teachers, the main conclusions are as follows: 1.The teacher evaluation committee is still too single to deal with specific incompetent teachers. 2. The composition of the teacher professional review committees is not professional enough. 3. The division of authority between the Educational Evaluation Committee and Gender Equality Committee has been different. 4. The relationship between teacher evaluation committee and the teacher professional review committees is still controversial. 5. The relationship between teacher evaluation committee and the school meeting is still unclear. Five suggestions based on the results of this study are as follows: 1. The education administration authority should uniformly formulate “reconsideration procedures”. 2. Teachers “act in violation of any pertinent laws or regulations” should be limited to violations of teachers’ obligations. 3. The court shall conduct a complete review of the decision of the teacher evaluation committee on “ not fulfilling a teacher’s duties, or being incompetent to teach”. 4. The teacher evaluation committee should employ more experts and scholars outside the school when it considers the incompetent teachers who are involved in “act in violation of any Pertinent Laws or Regulations” or “not fulfilling a teacher’s duties, or being incompetent to teach”. 5. The teacher professional review committees should reduce the proportion of teachers' recommendation.