摘要 以國家為己任的青年成為政治中最主要的對話對象,也是晚清時期由梁啟超重新發現與定義的群體。青年的「再」發現也成為中國同盟會推翻滿清後名正言順繼承的「遺產」之一。然而,繼承而來的青年群體,卻在政治考量之下成為一種策略,成為鞏固政權與合法統治地位的主體。自國民政府流亡至臺灣以來,愛國心與服從政府領導的意識形態,加諸於國民義務教育之上,造就一批「民國製造」的愛國青年,也在1970年代養成也收割。本篇論文則是以臺灣七0年代為主要論述年代,嘗試說明在七0年代臺灣面臨對外—中國正統代表形象搖搖欲墜;對內—中國論述受到鄉土論述的挑戰;對於中華民國來說堪稱是危急存亡之秋的七0年代,青年如何面對時代的巨變?又如何回應時代?而在以「鄉土論述」強勢劃分的七0年代,「三三」與「神州」青年甚至是「僑生」也成為被排除在鄉土之外另類的「異鄉人」。當本土意識、身份認同等關鍵問題在青年階段成為一代人的集體問題之際,落實在文本上的能夠折射出怎樣的論述話語?又代表了何種深具時代意義的階段性完成? 值得注意的是,依附在文本之下隱含的政治或是族群創傷又將如何在失落、重構與重新定義之下尋找安置自身的論述的可能性。
Abstract Youth who thought “Nation should be our the most important responsibility”, have become not only a political dialogue object, but also a community rediscovered and defined by Liang Qi Chao in the late Qing Dynasty. The rediscovered “youth” also became one of the legacies when the Chinese Nationalist Party overthrew the Manchu. However, the youth community has become a main part of a political strategy to consolidate political power and legal dominance of the Chinese Nationalist Party. Since the Nationalist government came to Taiwan, obedience and patriotism have become official ideologies. The Nationalist government was able to create a group of “patriotic youth” by implementing the ideologies in the compulsory education, and to harvest this group of “patriotic youth” in the 1970s. This thesis focus on the 1970s, its aim is to depict, when the Chinese orthodox representative image was crumbling down, and facing challenges from the “Taiwan nativist literature”(Xiangtu Wenxue), how the youth responded to the changes of Times? In the 1970s, Taiwan nativist discourse became a strong method to compartmentalize different identities. The youth in “San San” and “Shenzhou”, along with those young overseas Chinese students (qiao sheng), were considered as “outsiders”(yi xiang ren) which didn’t belong to the native land (xiang tu). When the main themes regarding local consciousness and identity have become the collective questions among those generations in their adolescences, what discourse will be reflected on literary texts? What kind of significance-rooted stage consummation do those collective questions represent? It is important to notice how can the political metaphors and collective trauma relied on literary texts, find a possibility to place its discourse through the processes of dismay, reconstruction and re-definition.