本研究欲探索心理師將主觀感受作為專業介入之經驗,透過回顧反移情的研究成果發現許多學者肯定反移情對於治療效果的貢獻,然而國內反移情研究成果以自行處理治療師因素居多,亦有少部分研究呈現反移情作為了解個案、促進個案覺察的經驗,但對於詳細的操作過程著墨不多。有鑑於此,本研究提出兩項研究問題:一、心理師分別產生及運用哪些主觀感受?二、心理師將主觀感受介入諮商有何意圖?方式為何?對諮商有何影響?本研究邀請五位心理師,以半結構訪談法進行訪談,並採用Boeije的質性研究方法分析資料。 研究結果顯示:一、共蒐集到十種心理師的感受,分成不捨個案的困境、對個案的特殊行為反感、喜悅個案的改變三大類型,每一種同時包含多重來源;二、共有五種運用主觀感受的意圖,分為建立關係、促進覺察、賦予新經驗三大類型,每一種意圖的形成包含多重因素;三、運用主觀感受的方式共有七種,分為進行評估、人際檢核與回饋、創造策略三大類型;四、運用主觀感受對諮商的影響共有七種,包含更安全的諮商關係、認知行為改變、自我接納與照顧三大類型。根據研究結果,本研究進一步提出研究限制與建議,提供未來的諮商工作者及專業訓練者參考
This study explores Counseling Psychologists’ Experiences of turning Subjective Feeling into counseling intervention. Although many scholars stand for efficacy contribute to countertransference, studies in Taiwan which related to countertransference paid more attention to deal with therapist factors on condition that definition: countertransference means all feelings of a therapist in counseling process. There’re few studies show experiences swing countertransference to conceptualizing clients’ problems or promote clients’ insight with few statement. In the light of this, there’re two research questions :1. Which Subjective Feeling did participants have and use? 2. What are participants’ intentions for turning Subjective Feeling into counseling intervention? How? What’s the influences? In a way of in-depth interview, this study invited 5 counseling psychologists and clinical psychologists to participate in the research. This study uses the Grounded Theory”Spirial Model”as the reaserch method to anayze the texts. Results of the study show: 1.Ten feelings. 2. Five intentions. 3. Seven ways to turn feelings into counseling interventions. 4. Seven influences. According to the results, the study shows limitations and provides suggestions.