本研究旨調查台灣地區同志(男同性戀、女同性戀、雙性戀)認同構面的組成、狀態、各構面之間的相關及背景變項間的差異情形。本研究以自我認同為同志者為研究對象,研究工具為翻譯和修改後的同志認同量表進行問卷調查,共蒐集有效問卷1028份。研究資料以描述性統計、t檢定、單因子變異數分析、積差相關進行統計分析,本研究結果的主要發現如下: 一、台灣地區同志認同具有,擔心汙名、保密隱匿、認同未定、拒絕身份(內化恐同)、發展困難、肯定接納、家人關係、公開出櫃、身分優越、核心價值等10個構面,且構面間部份具有相關情形。 二、不同生理性別的同志在認同構面間有部分差異情形。 三、不同年齡的同志在認同構面間有部分差異情形。 四、不同性傾向認同的同志在認同構面間有差異情形。 五、不同教育程度的同志在認同構面間有部分差異情形。 六、不同主要生活圈的同志在認同構面間有部分差異情形。 最後,本研究根據研究結果進行討論,並進一步提出具體建議,以提供教育工作者、助人專業工作者、同志領域的助人工作者參考。
This study explored the constitution of identities. The subjects of this study are lesbian, gay, and bisexual. The research method is Internet questionnaire investigation. The total returned questionnaires were 1028.The data was analyzed by descriptive statistics, T test, one way ANOVA, and Pearson’s correlation. The major findings of this research were as follows: 1、There were 10 dimensions on lesbian, gay, and bisexual’s identity,which are acceptance concerns, concealment motivation, identity uncertainty, internalized homonegativity, difficulty with the identity development process, identity superiority, identity affirmation, and identity centrality, coming out and Family interaction. Most dimensions are significant correlation with each other. 2、There were significant differences on lesbian, gay, and bisexual’s identity dimensions among gender. 3、There were significant differences on lesbian, gay, and bisexual’s identity dimensions among age. 4、There were significant differences on lesbian, gay, and bisexual’s identity dimensions among sexual orientation. 5、There were significant differences on lesbian, gay, and bisexual’s identity dimensions among level of education. 6、There were significant differences on lesbian, gay, and bisexual’s identity dimensions among residence. Finally, this study made a discussion-according to the results, and provided suggestions for researchers in the future.