透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.142.197.198
  • 學位論文

特殊教育學校校長教學領導之研究

A Study on Principals' Instructional Leadership in Special Educational Schools

指導教授 : 魯先華教授
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


摘 要 本研究旨在(一)了解特殊教育學校校長教學領導之現況。(二)探討不同背景教師所覺知之特殊教育學校校長實施教學領導之差異。依據研究結果提出建議,提供特殊教育學校校長教學領導實務之參考。 本研究以問卷調查法,研究者以自編問卷調查國內17所特殊教育學校與啟智學校647名特殊教育教師,有效資料共計545份,問卷回收率84.23%。所蒐集之資料以描述統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析進行資料處理與分析。本研究結果如下: 一、特殊教育學校校長其教學領導之現況堪稱良好。 二、特殊教育學校校長以學生為中心作為實踐自我教學領導之最高指標。 三、目前特殊教育學校對於實施教師評鑑的制度屬於萌芽階段。 四、特殊教育學校校長重視公共關係的發展,爭取社會資源以利推動校務發展。 五、目前特殊教育學校校長教學領導之角色,由教學視導已轉變為教學領導之風格。 六、目前特殊教育學校校長之教學領導仍有進步空間。 七、不同背景變項的特殊教育學校校長、主任、組長、導師、專任教師所知覺「校長教學領導」現況差異不一。 依據文獻分析與研究結果對教育行政機關、特殊教育 學校校長及教師與未來相關研究,提出下列建議: 一、 對教育主管機關之建議 (一) 建立教師專業成長與評鑑機制 (二) 督促學校符合時代教育趨勢 (三) 強化校長教學領導之培訓體系 二、 對特殊教育學校校長之建議 (一) 不斷積極進修充實教學領導專業知能 (二) 鼓勵且協助教師參與學校校務 (三)建立學校本位教師專業成長與教學評鑑之制度 三、 對特殊教育學校教師之建議 (一) 建立正確觀念促成教師專業成長與教學評鑑之制度 (二) 協助校長教學領導,以提升教學效能 四、 對未來研究之建議 (一) 研究主題方面 未來研究建議可針對特殊教育學校教師教學評鑑制度之建置與實施情形,以供特殊教育學校校長作為其教學領導之指標。 (二) 研究方法方面 研究方法可增加質性研究,收集更深入的個人感受,輔助量化研究典範的不足之處。 (三) 研究對象方面 未來研究可收集學生、學生家長、社區機構與教育行政單位對於校長教學領導之覺知程度,全面性探討特殊學校校長教學領導之現況。

並列摘要


Abstract The purposes of this research were (1)to understand the status quo of instructional leadership of principals in special education schools in Taiwan, (2)to explore the difference of perceptions of principals’ instructional leadership among educators of different variables and to make some recommendations for improvement of principals’ instructional leadership. This study was proceeding with survey study of “principals’ instructional leadership which edited by the writer. 647samples were chosen from 17 special educational schools in Taiwan. They were principals, department deans, department assistants deans, homeroom teachers and non-homeroom teachers. Finally 545data were collected and the return rate was up to 84.23% . The data were analyzed by proceeding with describing statistic, T- test, one way ANOVA, and the conclusions of this research were as follows: 1. The status quo of principals’ instructional leadership in special education schools in Taiwan was good. 2. The upper target for the special education principals in self- instructional leadership focus on the students. 3. The system of the teachers’ evaluation was just beginning. 4. The special education principals paid much attention to the development of the public relationship in order to get much social resource to push the school growth. 5. The role style of instructional leadership of principals in special education schools transform instructional superintend to instructional leadership. 6. There was much space in progress for the instructional leadership of principals in special education schools. 7. There is a significant difference of the perception for the different variables of the principals, department deans, department assistants deans, homeroom teachers and non-homeroom teachers in principals’ instructional leadership. According to the conclusions above there were some suggestions for reference in the future. 1. Suggestions for educational administrative institutions (1)Set up the growth of the teachers’ profession and teachers’ evaluation. (2)Press the school to catch up with the educational trend (3)Strengthen the training programs of principals’ instructional leadership. 2. Suggestions for principals in special education schools. (1)Enhance knowledge of the professional leadership (2)Encourage and help the teachers to pay attention on the school affairs. (3)Build up the growth of the school-based teachers’ profession and the system of teaching evaluation 3. Suggestion for teachers (1)Set up the positive concept and establish the system of teaching evaluation and strength the teachers’ profession progress. (2)Help the principals to carry out the instructional leadership 4. Suggestion for future research (1)In terms of the research subject; The research can focus the establishment of teachers teaching evaluation system and practicing status. (2)In terms of research methodology: Future research can add the quality research to get more deep personal feelings and to help the weakness of the quantity research (3)In terms of the research object: The research on gathering survey can push its frontier by incorporating other members.(e.g.,educational administrative personnel, parents, community institution personnel)

參考文獻


吳雨錫(2002)。國民小學校長教學領導與教師專業成長關係之研究。臺中:臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
林明地(2002)。校長教學領導實際:一所國小的參與觀察。教育行政論壇第五次研討會會議手冊。
張德銳(1992)。國民小學教師評鑑之研究。新竹:國立新竹師範學院。
李玉林(2001)。桃園縣國小校長教學領導角色知覺與實踐之研究。台北:國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
李安明(1997)。我國國民小學校長教學領導之研究。行政院國科會專題研究。NSC86-2413-h-134-006。

被引用紀錄


陳昭廷(2013)。四位國民中學校長教學領導的專業發展、作為與困境之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2013.00750

延伸閱讀