本研究旨在比較分析臺灣、香港、大陸兩岸三地國(初)中國(語)文古典詩詞曲教材內容。使用方法為文獻分析法、內容分析法和比較法。研究主體以臺灣教材為主,香港與大陸教材為輔。經文獻探討及教科書教材內容比較分析後,歸納出對於中學國語文古典詩詞曲教材內容的具體建議,得到結論如下: 第一、 臺灣版本詩詞曲教材隱含中國文學史的概念,賞析較為精深,體例安排亦稱完善。 第二、 香港地區詩詞曲教材編排方式較為活潑多元,並能強化閱讀策略。 第三 、大陸地區古典詩詞曲教學比重內容明顯優於臺、港兩地。 本研究針對兩岸三地國(初)中國(語)文古典詩詞曲教材提出以下建議: 第一、臺灣古典詩詞曲教材內容可多元開展選文的範疇、強化能力訓練;體例安排可再求創新並廣納西方文學理論之概念。 第二、香港古典詩詞曲教材編排可增加選文數量,兼顧體裁與作家面貌。 第三、大陸古典詩詞曲教程安排可補強選文賞析,增加多元學習單元。 第四、未來研究可就兩岸三地「詩詞曲」教材及教學方法進行全面比較。
This research aims to compare amd contrast classical Chinese poetry textbooks of junior high schools in Taiwan, Honk Kong and Mainland China. Documentary analysis, content analysis, and comparision method are used in this research. This research is primarily based on Taiwan’s textbooks and partly based on Hong Kong and Mainland China’s textbooks. After exploring documents and comparing and analyzing the textbook contents, the concrete suggestions for Chinese classical poetry textbooks of junior high school are summed up and the conclusions of this study are mentioned below: 1.Taiwan’s classical Chinese poetry textbooks provide a more in-depth analysis of texts and a balanced choice of different types of text. 2.Hong Kong’s classical Chinese poetry textbooks are written in an interesting way and emphasize reading strategies. 3.Mainland China’s classical Chinese poetry textbooks have a larger text collection than that of Taiwan or Hong Kong. Author of this study attempt to bring up suggestions for the textbooks in the three areas: 1.Taiwan’s classical Chinese poetry textbooks should broaden the selection of texts and strengthen students’ reading abilities. 2.Hong Kong’s classical Chinese poetry textbooks should increase the number of texts. 3.Mainland China’s classical Chinese poetry textbooks should deepen the analysis of texts and increase learning units. 4.Future research could make a whole comparison of the teaching methods and materials across Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Mainland China.