注音輸入法與縱橫輸入法教學對國小資源班學生中文輸入學習成效之比較研究

The Comparative Study of the Effect of Phonetic input method and CKC Chinese input method on Chinese Keyboarding Skills for Primary School Resource Program Students

張心怡(Hsin-Yi Chang)

指導教授 ： 王華沛

國立臺灣師範大學/教育學院/特殊教育學系/碩士(2009年)

摘要

本研究旨在探討並比較注音輸入法與縱橫輸入法教學對國小資源班學生中文輸入之學習成效。研究方法採單一受試研究法的交替處理設計，教學實驗分為介入期、維持期，以及類化期。本研究自變項為注音輸入法與縱橫輸入法，依變項為輸入正確率、輸入速度及類化效果，並以視覺分析法對實驗所蒐集之資料進行分析探討。本研究結果如下：

一、注音輸入法與縱橫輸入法對於所有受試者中文輸入的輸入正確率及輸入速度均具有良好的學習成效。

二、受試A與受試B縱橫輸入法之輸入正確率及輸入速度的學習成效較注音輸入法佳。

三、受試C注音輸入法與縱橫輸入法輸入正確率的學習成效並無差異。在輸入速度方面，縱橫輸入法則優於注音輸入法。

四、從類化效果之輸入正確率可知，受試A縱橫輸入法之輸入正確率優於注音輸入法；受試B之注音輸入法優於縱橫輸入法；受試C兩種輸入法之輸入正確率則無明顯差異。

五、從類化效果之輸入速度可知，受試A與受試B的縱橫輸入法輸入速度均優於注音輸入法，受試C兩種輸入法之輸入速度則無明顯差異。

關鍵字

注音輸入法 ； 縱橫輸入法 ； 中文輸入 ； 國小資源班學生 ； 交替處理設計

並列摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of Chinese Keyboarding Skills t by teaching Phonetic input method and CKC Chinese input method to primary school resource program students. An alternating treatments design of single subject research method was adopted. The experiment was divided into three phases: intervention, maintenance and generalization phases. The independent variables of this study were the Phonetic input method and CKC Chinese input method. The dependent variables were the typing accuracy rate, typing speed and generalization effects. Data were analyzed by visual analysis. The major findings were summarized as follows:

1.Phonetic input method and CKC Chinese input method did make good effect both on the typing accuracy rate and typing speed.

2.For subject A and B, CKC Chinese input method was better than Phonetic input method on the effect of the typing accuracy rate and typing speed.

3.For subject C, there is no significant difference between CKC Chinese input method and Phonetic input method on the effect of the typing accuracy rate. In the aspects of typing speed, CKC Chinese input method was better than Phonetic input method.

4.Regarding to the typing accuracy rate of generalization effects, subject A performed better when using CKC Chinese input method than Phonetic input method. Subject B performed better when using Phonetic input method than CKC Chinese input method. For subject C, there is no significant difference between CKC Chinese input method and Phonetic input method.

5.Regarding to the typing speed of generalization effects, subject A and subject B performed better when using CKC Chinese than Phonetic. For subject C, there is no significant difference between CKC Chinese input method and Phonetic input method.

並列關鍵字

Phonetic input method ； CKC Chinese input method ； Chinese Keyboarding Skills ； primary school resource program students ； alternating treatment design

參考文獻

唐惠欽（1998）：倉頡、大易與嘸蝦米輸入法之分析比較。正修學報，11，169-175。

教育部（2008a）：教育部中小學資訊教育白皮書。台北市：作者。

王映嵐（2006）：人因工程和弦鍵鼠之研究與設計。私立大同大學工業設計研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。

孟令珠（2002）：電腦化教學策略對中文輸入學習成效之影響探討。國立台灣師範大學資訊教育學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。

洪全慶（2001）：重度肢障者適用之中文輸入法研發與整合。國立台灣師範大學資訊教育學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。