透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.149.251.155
  • 學位論文

使用者介面設計與科技接受模式在資訊系統使用行為模式之研究-以大學課程資源網為例

A Study of User Behavior Model Based on User Interface Design and Technology Acceptance Model on Information System:A Case of University Courses Resource Website

指導教授 : 戴建耘
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究以使用者介面設計與科技接受模式取向建構「大學課程資源網」使用者的行為特徵模式。另一方面,就高中學生使用「大學課程資源網」的行為,探討使用者介面設計認同、科技接受程度與使用滿意度之現況與差異性分析。最後,驗證各徑路指向之顯著性。研究方法採取問卷調查法與統計分析,採用「大學課程資源網科技接受與使用者介面設計問卷」研究工具,經內部一致性信度分析與分層次因素效度分析後,針對新北市立錦和高級中學一至三年級學生,以立意抽樣方式進行調查,有效樣本共480人。最後,本研究依照研究目的和假設驗證所需,分別以描述性統計、單一樣本t檢定、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數、積差相關與多元迴歸進行資料統計。 經統計分析後得知:高中學生對於大學課程資源網的各構面題項,除了流暢度之外皆達到同意的顯著水準;差異性分析中,在三年級的學生在「知覺功能」與「使用滿意度」構面上同意程度較一年級學生高,第一類組的學生在「知覺功能」與「知覺系統支援」構面上同意程度較第三類組高,而時常使用網際網路搜尋資料的學生在「知覺功能」與「知覺有用性」同意程度高於偶爾使用的學生;各構面之間呈現高度相關,且在各路徑驗證皆符合研究假設之正向可預測性。

並列摘要


This study applied User Interface Design (UID) and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to explore the user behavior pattern model of "University Courses Resource Website". On the other hand, the researcher caught high school student's behavior of using University Courses Resource Website for comparison analysis and present situation by user interface design self-identity, technology accept level, and use satisfaction. A path analysis approach was applied to test the hypotheses. Questionnaire survey and statistical analysis approach were employed as research method. An instrument was developed and applied as research tool named "Technology Accept and User Interface Design Questionnaire for University Course Resource Website". The internal consistency analysis and factor analysis by domains was conducted to test the reliability and validity of the research instrument. The valid 480 samples were obtained by judgment sampling from first grade to third grade students studied in New Taipei Municipal Junior High School. Lastly, the researcher applied descriptive statistic, one-sample t-test, independent sample t-test, one way ANOVA, Pearson Correlation, and multiple regressions to deal with the research data. The result of analysis of variance shows that all factors reached agree level significantly except "Fluency". The agreement level of the third grade students was significantly higher than that of the first grade in the factor of "Perceived iv Functionality" and "Use Satisfaction"; The agreement level of students who major in liberal art, law and commerce was significant higher than that of students who major in medical science in the factor of "Perceived Functionality" and " Perceived System Support"; The agreement level of high frequency searching information students was significantly higher than fewer frequency searching information students in the factor of "Perceived Functionality" and "Perceived Usefulness". High correlation appeared among factors and the path analysis result demonstrated that hypotheses were proved that independent variables can predict dependent variable positively.

參考文獻


[2] 李德竹,”資訊素養的意義、內涵與演變”,圖書與資訊學刊,1-25,35,2000。
[52] 張明輝,”創新學校行政管理提高行政效率”,師友,29-30,251,1988。
[5] F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, “User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models,” Management Science., vol. 35, pp. 982-1002, 1989.
[6] P. Legris, J. Ingham, and P. Collerette, “Why do people use information technology? a critical review of the technology acceptance model,” Information and Management., vol.40, pp. 191-204, 2003.
[7] P. R. Bagozzi, “The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for A Paradigm Shift,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems., vol. 8, pp. 244-254, 2007.

延伸閱讀