女大學生親職化、關係性自我與愛情關係適應之相關研究

A correlational study on parentification, the self-in-relation, and love relationship adjustment of the female college students

吳端靜(Dung-Ching Wu)

指導教授 ： 陳秉華 ； 盧雪梅

國立臺灣師範大學/教育學院/教育心理與輔導學系/碩士(2012年)

摘要

本研究在探討女大學生親職化、關係性自我與愛情關係適應之關係。本研究採問卷調查法，以便利取樣方式蒐集台灣北部地區公私立大學的948名女大學生為有效樣本。本研究工具包括「過去和現在親職化量表」、「關係性自我量表」以及「愛情關係適應量表」。資料經過多變項變異數分析、典型相關和多元迴歸分析後，主要研究發現如下：

一、不同出生序、父母婚姻狀況之女大學生在親職化程度上有顯著差異。
二、不同出生序之女大學生在愛情關係適應上有顯著差異；但不同父母婚姻狀況之女大學生則無。
三、不同親職化程度的女大學生，在愛情關係適應上有顯著差異，其中「高親職化組」與「非高親職化組」在「衝突/矛盾」和「自主/共生」等面向有顯著差異。
四、在高度親職化女大學生中，親職化程度改變者與未改變者，在愛情關係適應上有顯著差異，特別在「滿意/成長」和「衝突/矛盾」兩個面向上。
五、不同親職化程度的女大學生，在關係性自我上有顯著差異，其中「高親職化組」與「非高親職化組」在「分離式自我」、「平衡關懷」及「以他人為首」等面向有顯著差異。
六、在高度親職化女大學生中，親職化程度改變者與未改變者，在關係性自我上有顯著差異，特別在「平衡關懷」上有顯著差異。
七、女大學生親職化與愛情關係適應之間有顯著典型相關，其中親職化的「不公平性」和「情感性照顧」與愛情關係適應的「矛盾/衝突」感受呈現正相關；而親職化的「功能性照顧」與愛情關係適應的「滿意/成長」亦呈現正相關。
八、女大學生親職化與關係性自我之間有顯著典型相關，其中親職化的「不公平性」與關係性自我的「連結性自我」和「平衡關懷」呈現負相關；親職化的「情感性照顧」與關係性自我的「連結性自我」、「平衡關懷」與「以他人為首」呈現正相關；而親職化的「功能性照顧」與關係性自我的「連結性自我」呈現正相關。
九、女大學生關係性自我與愛情關係適應之間有顯著典型相關，其中關係性自我的「分離式自我」、「以他人為首」與愛情關係適應的「衝突/矛盾」和「自主/共生」呈現正相關；關係性自我的「連結性自我」、「平衡關懷」與愛情關係適應的「滿意/成長」呈現正相關。
十、女大學生親職化、關係性自我對愛情關係適應有具有預測力。

最後依據本研究之發現，針對親職、心理諮商與學校教育以及未來研究方向提出具體建議。

關鍵字

女大學生 ； 親職化 ； 關係性自我 ； 愛情關係適應

並列摘要

The purposes of this study were to investigate the relationships among parentification, self-in-relation, and love relationship adjustment of female college students.Questionnaire survey is conducted as the study method. The samples are comprised of 948 female college students from north area of Taiwan based on purposive sampling. Instruments used in this study were “Past and Current Parentification Scale”, “Self-in-relation Measurement”, and “Love Relationship Adjustment Measurement”. Data obtained in this study were analyzed by MANOVAs , canonical correlation analysis and multiple stepwise regression analysis. The findings are as follows:

1.There was significant difference in “parentification” among groups of birth order and those from different parental marital status.
2.There was significant difference in “love relationship adjustment” among groups of birth order, while there was no significant difference in “love relationship adjustment” among groups from different parental marital status.
3.There was significant difference in “love relationship adjustment” among groups of different degree of parentification. Among the study, there was significance in “conflict/ paradox” and “autonomy/ conciliation” among “the high degree group of parentification” and “the no high degree group of parentification”.
4.There was significant difference in “love relationship adjustment” among the changeable group of parentifcation and the unchangeable group of parentification in the high parentification female college students, especially in “growth/ satisfaction” and “conflict/ paradox”.
5.There was significant difference in “self-in-relation” among groups of different degree of parentification. Among the study, there was significance in “the separate self” , “self and other care” and “primary of other care” among “the high degree group of parentification” and “the no high degree group of parentification”.
6.There was significant difference in “self-in-relation” among the changeable group of parentifcation and the unchangeable group of parentification in the high parentification female college students, especially in “self and other care”.
7.There was significant canonical correlation among the parentification and the love relationship adjustment. On the one hand, there is a significantly positive relationship between “unfairness”,“emotional caregiving” of parentification and “conflict/ paradox” of the love relationship adjustment. On the other hand, there is also a significantly positive relationship between “instrument caregiving” of parentification and “growth/ satisfaction” of the love relationship adjustment.
8.There was a significant canonical correlation among the parentification and the self-in-relation. First, there is a significantly negative relationship between “unfairness” of parentification and “the connected self” , ”self and other care” of the self-in-relation. Second, there is a significantly positive relationship between “emotional caregiving” of parentification and “the connected self” , ”self and other care”, “primacy of other care” of the self-in-relation. Finally, there is a significantly positive relationship between “instrumental caregiving” of parentification and “the connected self” of the self-in-relation.
9.There was a significant canonical correlation among the self-in-relation and the love relationship adjustment. On the one hand, there is a significantly positive relationship between “the seperate self” ,”primacy of other car” of the self-in-relation and “conflict/ paradox”, “autonomy/ conciliation” of the love relationship adjustment. On the other hand, there is a significantly positive relationship between “the connected self”, “ self and other care” of the self-in-relation and “growth/ satisfaction” of the love relationship adjustment.
10.Parentification, self-in-relation could effectively predict the love relationship adjustment.

In the end, the study conducts discussion based on the study results, proposing substantial suggestions for psychological consultation, school education, the gender relationship of females in early adulthood, and future studies as a reference.

並列關鍵字

Female college student ； Parentification ； Self-in-relation ； Love relationship adjustment

參考文獻

王慶福、王郁茗（2007）。大學生知覺其人際依附風格對愛情關係適應之影響。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理學報，38(4)，397-415。

吳嘉瑜（2005）。倒轉的親子位置--『親職化』兒童之相關文獻探討。輔導季刊，41(1)，21-28。

李尹(2007)。愛情的面貌：異性戀親密關係中的性/別政治。高雄醫學大學性別學系碩士論文。

李美枝（1993）。從有關公平判斷的研究結果看中國人之人己關係的界線。本土心理學研究，1，267-300。

李美枝、鍾秋玉（1996）。性別與性別角色析論。本土心理學研究，6，260-299。