我國在西元2000年總統大選,由民主進步黨取得執政權,結束中國國民黨數十年長期執政,成功促成我國政治史上第一次政黨輪替。全新的政府理念和想法,使許多政策及法令開始有不同面向的發展,也配合國際趨勢,在文化政策上有新的主軸呈現。執政期間,不僅在政策及理念上重視在地生活文化,也開始培植文化創意產業,對我國之文化事務有不同的想像及發展。 而後西元2008年同樣被視為我國政治發展史上分水嶺的一年。自西元2000年民主進步黨成功贏得總統大選後,經過陳水扁總統八年執政,中國國民黨提名之總統候選人馬英九先生於2008年重新取得政權,中華民國在該年二次政黨輪替。延續民進黨執政時期之文化政策,國民黨亦呈現出不同於西元2000年以前舊國民黨時代的政策主軸。 而在推動文化政策時,「表演藝術」更為其中發展核心之一,除了在人類文化史上有長遠的歷史淵源外,現今的表演藝術更有可能創造工作機會及經濟價值,甚至扮演傳承文化意涵的角色。我國政府在發展文創產業時,也將音樂及表演藝術類別獨立,制定相關政策以推動文化發展。 現今政府與民眾之間的關係已非傳統霸權的上下從屬,而著重於民主制度的雙向溝通行銷模式。當政府在制定表演藝術政策時以何為依據?又如何針對表演藝術政策做規劃及評估以利往後政策發展推行?本研究將以環境背景與現今較接近的第二次政黨輪替為軸,比較文建會在推動表演藝術政策時的政策演變差異,透過文獻資料的蒐集,了解第二次政黨輪替前後,文建會制定、執行表演藝術政策的方向,再透過深度訪談分析,探討兩黨政府對於表演藝術政策演變上質性面與規畫評估的異同。研究目的在於了解第二次政黨輪替前後,兩黨政府於表演藝術政策上的差異,分析成效及影響,作為未來文化部成立及往後政策發展時,制定及推行表演藝術政策的參考與借鏡。 關鍵字:表演藝術、文建會、表演藝術政策、第二次政黨輪替
The Republic of China (ROC) held the president election in 2000. The Democratic Progressive Party (DDP) won the presidency with the election and ended the decades of ruling of the Kuomintang of China (KMT). It successfully made the first party-switching in the political history of ROC. Policies and ordinances began developing in different ways because of the whole new government concepts and ideas. With the international trends, new subject of cultural policies was set. During the ruling period of the DPP, the government not only placed importance on native living culture in policies and concepts, but also began cultivating cultural and creative industries. It made our cultural affairs a different imagination and development. In 2008, it was the year as the division of political history in ROC. The DDP won the presidential election in 2000. After 8-year ruling of Chen Shui-bian, Ma Ying-jeou, the KMT's nominee, won the presidency in 2008. It was the second party-switching in ROC. To maintain those cultural policies during the DDP was ruling, the KMT set the subject of policies which were different from the old KMT times. While the government was pushing the cultural policies, “Performing Arts” especially became one of the developing cores. Performing Arts takes a long-term part in the cultural history of humans. Nowadays, it not only has more chances to create working opportunities and economic value but also even plays a role of passing down the culture. To push the cultural development, the government separates Music and Performing Arts into individual categories to set related policies when they are cultivating cultural and creative industries. Today, relations between people and the government are not like the subordinate-superior hierarchical relationship of traditional hegemony. It begins to emphasize the two-way communication marketing of the democratic system. What is the basis they based on when the government is setting the performing arts policy? How do they plan and estimate the performing arts policy to push and develop the policy later? This research takes the background and the second party-switching which is closer till now as the research topic to compare the differences when the Council of Cultural Affairs pushes the performing arts policy. With collection of documents and information, it sees the way that the Council of Cultural Affairs sets and executes the performing arts policy before and after the second party-switching. And through analysis of depth interview, the research investigates the similarities and differences of the evolution of the performing arts policy and what they estimate and plan. The researching purpose is to understand the differences of the performing arts policy between the DDP and the KMT government, and to analyze results and influences. When the Ministry of Culture is established and ready to develop policies in the future, it can be a reference as setting and pushing the performing arts policy. Key words: Performing Arts, Council of Cultural Affairs, Performing Arts Policy, the Second Change of Ruling Party.