透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.137.180.32
  • 學位論文

四位國民中學校長領導心智模式之研究

Mental Models of Leadership in Four Junior High School Principals

指導教授 : 潘慧玲
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


並列摘要


Since 1980s, both the school restructuring abroad and the domestic educational policies have emphasized the importance of educational reform and the change in the principals’ leadership. Most studies of principals’ leadership stressed the trait theory, leading styles, power models and so on. However, there were few studies that adopted cognitive approach attempting to understand what messages and information principals picked up, and how principals’ core belief affected their leading behaviors. In recent years, scholars conducting the viewpoint of cognitive approach pay much attention to these issues and they expect to understand how leaders use their mental models to solve problems of school administration. They want to find out principals' cognition, core belief, and the problem types which principals perceive and deal with behind their leading behaviors. Thus, they can figure out a better way for principals to adjust their leading behaviors. In the studies of principals’ mental models of leadership, we can understand the problems that arisen from educational reform and are closely related to the ecology of the campus. By observing principals’ speeches and behaviors, I investigated how principals use their tacit knowledge, and how they exert influences when managing schools. To complete my study, I invited four junior high school principals recommended by the bureau of education and educational experts to join my project. With their participation, my study attempted to examine how the four principals form their mental models of leadership, and use the models on problem solving. As for the methodology of the study, I collected data mainly from interviews and used short-term observations, documents analysis, and journal reflection to complement my study on the influential factors, content, the operation, and the formative course of mental models of leadership in the four principals. What follows are the conclusions and suggestions of this study. According to the result of my study, conclusions are as follows: 1. The growing-up course and the administrative experiences of principals greatly influence their mental models. 2. The context of school organization influences and limits the operation of principals’ mental models. 3. The completeness in mental model of leadership is the origin of having high-quality influence for principals. 4. The core belief in principals’ mental model of leadership is the key to focus leadership goals. 5. The novice principals rely on personages to get everyday messages, while expert principals rely on experiences and intuitions to get everyday messages. 6. The development of mental model of leadership has three main orientations—the administrative leadership, the curriculum leadership, and the mix of the two. 7. Having habits to reflection is an important key for principals to have high-quality leadership. 8. The model principals have significant influence on principals’ mental model of leadership. On the basis of above-mentioned conclusions, my study proposes some suggestions for the administrative institutions of education, the elementary and junior high school principals, and the follow-up studies: 1. Suggestions for the administrative institutions of education: (1)Enhancing the quality and quantity of workshops of administrative leadership. (2)Encouraging model principals to share their ideals and experiences. (3)Enriching the content of the apprenticeship of principal leadership. 2. Suggestions for the elementary and junior high school principals: (1)Trying to show the mental model of leadership. (2)Making reflection as a habit. (3)Managing personal memory system. (4)Building think tanks and interpersonal networks. 3. Suggestions for the follow-up studies: (1)The theme of study: more exploring the themes of the problem solving, conscious strategies, novice and expert, and type of leadership. (2)The object of study: extending to the schools’ levels, or narrowing the object to the small groups' leaders. (3)The method of study: strengthening the observation of field and informal interview, or adopting the study of grounded theory. (4)The ethics of study: having enough communication with participants of study and revising our study approach or attitude at any time.

被引用紀錄


曾尹彥(2006)。國民中學組織正當性之研究-以北部六縣市為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-2304200713222432
邱鈺婷(2009)。六位國中女校長的問題解決心智運作:後結構女性主義的分析觀點〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315163614
朴東飛(2010)。在台韓裔韓文教授之跨文化教學經驗〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315192949
黃培培(2011)。國民中學教務主任行政決定之心智模式研究:四位教務主任之個案〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315224081
陳名昱(2011)。南投縣偏遠地區國民中學校長授能領導與教師領導之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315251417

延伸閱讀