透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.142.171.180
  • 學位論文

台北市田園小學身心障礙資源班運作之調查研究

An Investigation Research on Resource Rooms of Pastoral Elementary Schools in Taipei City

指導教授 : 盧台華
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究目的在探討台北市田園小學身心障礙資源班運作的現況、困難和意見,採問卷調查和個別訪談方式,以台北市田園小學為研究對象,包括資源班教師、普通班教師、行政人員和資源班家長。 研究結論分別說明如下: 一、身心障礙資源班運作現況 1.田園小學資源班服務對象以本學區學生為主,障礙程度以輕度最多達九成,障礙類別則以學習障礙最多,且另有資優生和外國學生就讀資源班,因此資源服務對象包括障礙和資優兩大類學生,並視各校學生需要而提供資源服務。服務內容以直接教學最多,但未來各校可視特殊需求學生的實際情形調整資源教室方案,且直接教學與諮詢服務宜並重。資源班的轉介和安置可視學生的需求和家長的意願,經過鑑輔會核准或學校特教推行委員會同意,皆可入資源班就讀。大多數資源班編制資源教師一人,以目前資源班招收的學生數和障礙程度而言,一位資源教師應已足夠。 2.資源班直接教學以學科補救為主,主要為數學,其次為國語。上課時間的運用則以朝會時間和午休時間最多,資源服務宜整合校內校外人力資源,提供特教學生全面性的多元服務。而大多數田園小學的資源教室空間不足,影響資源班同時上課學生數減少和設備器材的購置。 二、對實施資源班看法異同之分析: 1.資源教師認為學生在資源班上課節數已足夠,但行政人員、普通教師和家長卻認為不足,達到顯著差異。若資源班在身心障礙學生招生不足情況下,學校人員認為擴大服務對象以情緒或行為問題學生優先,其次為學習障礙,但家長選答以學習障礙為最多。家長對資源班之課程、教學、評量與IEP內容之了解比例均高於行政人員和普通教師,資源教師應常與相關人員溝通協調有關學生在資源班的學習情況。 2.資源教師和普通教師的合作教學中,普通教師滿意度高於資源教師,合作教學深具支援普通班之功能。但採用何種方式入普通班服務影響資源教師和普通教師的合作意願。 三、面臨的困難與意見: 1.資源教師主要面臨家長無法配合和獨自經營資源班的困難。普通教師面臨學生程度差異大,教學困難,家長配合度低,和自我挫折感大的問題。家長主要面臨孩子課業問題和學習態度欠佳的困難。 2.田園小學雖然是小校小班,學生人數少,大多數的學校人員和 家長認為仍有必要設置資源班。

並列摘要


The purpose of this thesis was to investigate the current status, the difficulties and the opinions of resource rooms when they operated in the *pastoral elementary schools in Taipei City. A survey questionnaire designed by the researcher was used as the major research instrument. The main findings of this study was discussed and elaborated as follows: I. Current status of resource rooms 1.The resource rooms of pastoral elementary schools mainly provided services to students with special needs who belonged to their own school districts. 90% of students were mildly handicapped and most of them were learning-disabled. There were also gifted students and foreign students receiving the services from resource rooms. Most of the services provided was direct instruction. The referral and placement of students with special needs had to obtain the agreement of their parents. Then the referral was forwarded to the * PEP team. Students passing the evaluation by the PEP team or the committee of school special education could be placed in the resource rooms and received resource service. Currently, one resource teacher was sufficient for all the affairs of a resource room in the pastoral elementary school because the students were not many and not severe either. 2.The direct instruction in resource room was mainly the instruction on subjects, first was Mathematics and second Mandarin. Many resource rooms faced the problem of not having enough space in their classrooms. Owing to the lack of space, they couldn’t place more students and purchase more facilities in their classrooms. II. Analysis of different opinions about the operation of resource room 1.There was a remarkable gap about the operation of resource rooms between the resource teachers and school staffs and parents. The resource teachers thought the students who attended classes in resource rooms were sufficient while the administrators, the regular teachers and the parents thought they were not enough. The parents knew and understood the courses, instruction, assessment and IEP of special students more than the administrators and regular teachers did. This indicated that the resource teachers should improve the communication and negotiation with other related school staffs about the learning situation of special students in resource room. 2.The co-teaching between resource teachers and regular teachers was more appreciated by the regular teachers than the resource teachers. This indicated that the co-teaching could assist the teaching activities in regular classrooms. But the way of giving assistance in the teaching activities in regular classrooms could influence the will of cooperation between resource teachers and regular teachers. III. Difficulties and problems 1.The main difficulties from resource teachers were to get the cooperation from the parents and to manage the resource classroom alone. For the regular teachers, they had problems with teaching students with big differences in the same class, the problems of low cooperation from the parents and of self-frustration as well. As for the parents, they were bothered by the learning problems of their children and their low learning motivation. 2.Although pastoral elementary schools were small size schools with few students in every class, most school staffs and parents still thought that it was necessary to set up a resource room.

參考文獻


張蓓莉主編(民88)。身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定原則鑑定基準說明手冊。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系編印。
張蓓莉(民77)。資源教室方案的發展方向。我國特殊教育的回顧與展望,183-208。
陳綠萍(民90)。台北市國民小學就讀普通班身心障礙學生支持系統之調查研究。國立台北師範學院碩士論文。
鄒小蘭(民90)。國民小學特殊教育行政組織及其運作之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育碩士論文。
蕭敏華(民86)。國民小學班級開放程度及其教育效果:以臺北縣開放教育班例之初步分析。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。

被引用紀錄


王明美(2010)。國小資源班與普通班教師對身障學生的教學信念與教師合作研究〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201000455
林秀穗(2007)。知識管理的觀點運用在國民小學推展融合教育之行動研究-以桃園縣希望國小為例〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu200700386
柯懿真(2003)。資源教師與普通班教師實施合作教學之行動研究--以二個班級為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-2603200719134609
陳盈利(2004)。國民小學特殊教育資源整合可行途徑之研究-以臺北市中正區身心障礙資源班為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-2004200712560720
林妙(2005)。國小聽障生家長參與個別化教育計畫之調查研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-2004200715484674

延伸閱讀