高雄市老年人健康促進生活型態、休閒知覺自由與心理幸福滿足感之相關研究

A study elderly health promoting lifestyle, Perceived freedom in leisure and Psychological Well-being in the Kaohsing

湯慧娟(Tang Hui-Chuan)

指導教授 ： 王宗吉

國立臺灣師範大學/運動與休閒學院/體育學系/碩士(2002年)

摘要

本研究是以高雄市65歲以上之老年人為研究母群體，以立意取樣方式進行抽樣，共取得335位樣本。主要目的為：(一)、瞭解目前老年人的健康促進生活型態、休閒知覺自由及心理幸福滿足感的實際情形。(二)、探討不同背景變項之老年人的健康促進生活型態、休閒知覺自由及心理幸福滿足感的差異情形。(三)、探討老年人的健康促進生活型態、休閒知覺自由對幸福感之間影響效果。(四)、探討老年人的健康促進生活型態、休閒知覺自由在幸福感的預測力。研究工具有健康促進生活型態量表、休閒知覺自由量表、心理幸福滿足感量表及基本資料表。重要結果歸納如下：
一、高雄市老年人整體健康促進生活型態、休閒知覺自由程度及心理幸福滿足感均屬於中上。
二、在健康促進生活型態方面：整體而言男性優於女性，且居住及婚姻狀況會受配偶是否健在之影響；另外，受過教育且自己有收入者較有執行健康促進之正向行為。
三、在休閒知覺自由方面：年輕老人(65-69歲)且配偶健在者休閒知覺自由較高；另外，在生活上自己有收入且小學以上教育程度之老年人知覺休閒自由愈高。
四、在心理幸福滿足感方面：與家人同住(配偶、子女)之年輕老人，並有自己收入者心理幸福滿足感愈高。
五、健康促進生活型態及休閒知覺自由與心理幸福滿足感之間呈現相關情形。
六、健康促進生活型態與休閒知覺自由各分層面可以共同預測心理幸福滿足感整體層面及分層面。

關鍵字

健康促進生活型態 ； 休閒知覺自由 ； 心理幸福滿足感

並列摘要

A purposive sampling is used to study the relations for a survey population of elders higher than 65 ages in Kaohsiung city. The main purposes for this study are included: (1) Understanding the current states of health promoting lifestyle, freedom in leisure, and psychological well-being of elders; (2) Finding the differences between health promoting lifestyle, freedom in leisure, and psychological well-being of elders; (3) Finding the cross-coupling effects between health promoting lifestyle, freedom in leisure, and psychological well-being of elders; and (4) Finding the predictive capacity of health promoting lifestyle, freedom in leisure, and psychological well-being of elders.
The study tools include measurement table of health promoting lifestyle, freedom in leisure, and psychological well-being, and basic data of tested elder etc. The main results of this study are:
(1). The health promoting lifestyle, freedom in leisure, and psychological well-being of elders living in Kaohsiung city are all belong to medium higher.
(2). In the health promoting lifestyle, the male is better than female. The states of living and conjugality affected the health of spouse, and the elders of educated and had income are showed the positive behaviour of health promotion.
(3). In the freedom in leisure, the higher degree of the young elders (65-69 ages) and spouse lived. Besides, the better recognition of had income and higher elementary school graduation of elders.
(4). In the psychological well-being, the higher satiation of the young elders living with inmates and had income.
(5). The health promoting lifestyle, freedom in leisure, and psychological well-being are showed interrelated.
(6). The sub-layer of health promoting lifestyle and freedom in leisure can predict the whole and sub-layer of psychological well-being.

並列關鍵字

Health promoting lifestyle ； Freedom in leisure ； Psychological well-being

參考文獻

王瑞霞、許秀月。(民86)。社區老年人健康促進因素的探討~以高雄市三民區為例。護理研究，5(4)，321-329。

行政院衛生署。(2000年11月18日)。綜合資料。資訊走廊。

高淑芬、蕭冰如、蔡秀卿、邱佩怡。(民89)。老年人的健康促進生活型態與衛生教育。護理雜誌，47 (1), 13-18。

陳美燕、王明誠、邱憲章、吳運東。(民84)。桃園地區醫師實施健康促進行為之探討。中華衛誌，14(1)，32-40。

黃毓華、邱啟潤。(民86)。高雄地區大學生健康促進生活型態之預測因子。中華衛誌，16(1)，24-36。