摘要 本研究之主要目的為瞭解2002年世界盃男子競技體操賽六個項目裁判員間評審分數之準確性,及選手間細微分數差距是與本身技術水準有關,還是與裁判員評分時的誤差具有較大相關性,藉以提供國內競技體操裁判員、教練與選手參考,並作為往後訓練或比賽之應用。本研究是以參加2002年世界盃男子競技體操賽單項預賽、複賽與決賽之B組各36位裁判員為研究對象,針對裁判員原始評分資料以肯德爾和諧係數(Kendall coefficient of concordance)、相依樣本單因子變異數(ANOVA)及皮爾遜(K.pearson)積差相關進行統計分析,所得結論為: 一、預賽與複賽六個項目裁判員評分具有客觀一致性,且能有效評定出參賽選手優劣,準確性極高。 二、決賽中除了跳馬項目外,其餘五個項目裁判員評分雖然具有客觀一致性,但卻無法有效分辨出參賽選手好壞,準確性較低。 三、當參賽選手彼此水準差距較大時,此時選手間的細微分數差異,主要是與選手本身體操技術水準有關,而當參賽選手彼此水準差距較小時,此時選手間的細微分數差異,則是與裁判員評分時的誤差具有較大相關性(p<.05)。 關鍵詞:世界盃競技體操賽、男子競技體操裁判員、評分準確性
Abstract The purpose of this study is to understand the accuracy of juries’ evaluation in the men’s artistic gymnastics competitions and the association of the differences between gymnasts’ scores with the gymnasts’ exercise-performing skills and the errors of juries’ evaluation. Using the statistical tests of Kendall coefficient of concordance, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Pearson product-moment correlation, we analyzed the original data of gymnasts’ scores evaluated by 36 judges in the qualifications and apparatus finals of men’s artistic gymnastics competition at the World Championship in 2002, respectively. Our results demonstrated that: (1) the objectivity and concordance of judges’ evaluation in the qualifications of six apparatuses was significant, and judges can precisely differentiate the levels of gymnasts’ exercise-performing skills, (2) The objectivity and concordance of judges’ evaluation was significant in all finals of apparatuses except the vault, but judges were not able to precisely differentiate the levels of gymnasts’ exercise-performing skills, (3) when the levels of gymnasts’ exercise-performing skills were significantly different, the differences between gymnasts’ scores mainly resulted form the differences of exercise-performing skills, whereas the differences between the scores were significantly correlated with the judges’ evaluating errors(p<.05) when the differences of exercise-performing skills were vary small between gymnasts. The results of this study can serve as the reference for training the judges, coaches and gymnasts of men’s artistic gymnastics in Taiwan. Key Words:world championship, judge, the accuracy of evaluation