以基於混合多準則決策分析與萃思法之品質機能展開流程改善專利提案品質

A Hybird Multiple-Criteria Decision Making Methods and TRIZ Based on Quality Function Deployment Process for Improving Patent Proposal Quality

蕭達隆(Hsiao Ta-Lung)

指導教授 ： 黃啟祐

國立臺灣師範大學/科技與工程學院/工業教育學系/碩士(2016年)

https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202204469

摘要

依據世界智慧財產權組織(WIPO)的統計數據顯示，善用專利資訊, 可以大幅縮減六成研發時間，節省四成研發經費，顯然，專利對於創新亟有助益。雖然專利對創新之幫助極大，但由於專利申請費用極高，專利提案之品質必須大幅提升，以求專利有效性極大、權利金最高、價值最大化。為提升專利提案品質，本研究擬導入決策分析模式、品質機能展開與萃思法定義專利品質分析與提昇架構。 本研究首先回顧文獻，歸納專利之權利指標以及專利之審查基準，作為品質機能展開法之市場需求因素與技術參數，並藉由以決策實驗法建構權利指標之影響關係，做為決策分析問題之架構後，導入分析網絡流程法，求取對應每一權利指標之權重，以求取權利指標與技術參數間之關聯係數後，求取與權利指標關聯度最高之技術參數。再以萃思法定義解決互相矛盾權利指標之創新策略。
本研究實證基礎將以我國主要IT公司之專利提案實證可行性，用於驗證所提出的分析框架的可行性。以實證研究的結果基礎上，用廉價的不持久性代替昂貴的持久性原則和改變物體聚合態原則以及改變顏色原則與周期作用原則是最重要的策略。此將為未來欲進行類似研究可接續之方向。此研究策略和實證研究的結果可以建議給IT公司成為未來專利提案的策略基礎。

關鍵字

專利提案品質 ； 專利分析 ； 多準則決策分析 ； 決策實驗法網絡流程法 ； 品質機能展開 ； 萃思法

並列摘要

Based on the statistics being provided by the World Intelligent Property Organization (WIPO), 60% of the time spent in research-and-development (R&D) can be reduced and 40% of budget thereof can also be saved if the patent information can be in good use in advance. It is no doubt that the patent system is beneficial to innovation of industry.. Therefore, this research aims to define an analytic framework for enhancing the quality of patent proposals. For enhancing the quality of proposal for patent application, the present research is proposed to introduce the Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) method, and the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ) to define the analytic framework for patent quality and improvement.
An empirical study based on one of the world’s leading IT company in Taiwan will be used to verify the feasibility of the proposed analytic framework. Based on the empirical study results, “Cheap short-living objects”, “Parameter Change”, ”Color Changes” and “Periodic Action” are the most important strategies. The proposed framework and the empirical study results can serve as the basis for Improving Patent Proposal Quality of IT company in the future.

並列關鍵字

Patent Proposal Quality ； Multiple-criteria decision making ； Patent family ； Patent Portfolio ； DEMATEL base Network Process

參考文獻

Affairs, B. o. N. (1988). The United States Patents Quarterly: Bureau of National Affairs.

Altuntas, S., & Dereli, T. (2015). A novel approach based on DEMATEL method and patent citation analysis for prioritizing a portfolio of investment projects. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(3), 1003-1012.

Berk, J. (2010). Cost reduction and optimization for manufacturing and industrial companies (Vol. 2): John Wiley & Sons.

Bragg, S. M. (2010). Cost reduction analysis: tools and strategies (Vol. 7): John Wiley & Sons.

Chang, Y.-S., Chien, Y.-H., Yu, K.-C., Chu, Y.-H., & Chen, M. Y.-c. (2015). Effect of TRIZ on the Creativity of Engineering Students. Thinking Skills and Creativity.