不同訓練方式與接發球反應時間之比較

Comparison of the effect of training with fitLight TrainerTM versus conventional agility training on serve reception reaction time

簡佳慧(Chein Chia-Hui)

指導教授 ： 張恩崇

國立臺灣師範大學/運動與休閒學院/運動競技學系/碩士(2019年)

https://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.DAP.003.2019.F03

摘要

本研究的主要目的在探討燈光儀器訓練組及傳統敏捷訓練組對接球球移動時間的影響，排球選手需具備高速度、高速耐力、高爆發力及個人基本技術等基本能力，希望透過不同的訓練方式來加強上述的基本能力。排球運動不會因個人體型嬌小而造成先天條件的不公平，它能透過完善規劃做整體訓練彌補先天不足的部分，相信我國排球在球場上能得到優異成績大放異彩，並能重返國際比賽舞台上。此研究主要測試項目為接發球常用步伐（跨步、踮步跨、側併步），本研究以國立臺灣師範大學女子排球代表隊選手作為受試對象（女子平均身高為172±4、女子體重為63±5.7kg、年齡為 20 ± 4.76yrs、球齡為 8 ± 2.88yrs）。以隨機取樣法（Stratified Sampling），選手平均分成兩組，第一組為燈光儀器訓練組，第二組為傳統敏捷訓練組。在每周星期一、三、五做訓練，訓練六周，訓練時間為一個半小時，其中一組平常訓練的基礎上增加燈光儀器訓練組內容，另一組則加上傳統敏捷訓練。本實驗中所實施的體能訓練包括跳躍，力量和協調性訓練。各個訓練都是以能迅速掌握正確動作為目的，在作示範的前提下進行的，六周後利用反應時間測試儀進行後測，本研究將所得資料以敘述性統計之平均數、標準差，呈現實驗研究對象之基本資料與各項實驗紀錄資料，再以單因子共變數分析（One-way ANCOVA）檢驗兩組實驗分組之間在前、後測的成績，在起步的反應時間是否達到顯著水準，研究結果如下：
一、 在經過六周燈光儀器訓練後，有助於提升跨步、踮步跨以及側併步的秒數，雖然前兩者未達顯著水準，後者有達到顯著水準，但從平均數統計結果來看皆有明顯進步。
二、 在經過傳統敏捷訓練後，無助於提升跨步、踮步跨以及側併步的秒數，也未達顯著水準。
三、 比較燈光儀器訓練(實驗組)及傳統敏捷訓練(對照組)，實驗組明顯比對照組來的有效果，傳統敏捷訓練組則維持。

關鍵字

反應時間 ； 燈光儀器訓練 ； 傳統敏捷訓練

並列摘要

The main objective of this study was to compare the effect of training with fitLight Trainer™ and conventional agility training on movement time of serve reception. Speed, endurance, power and individual fundamental techniques are important capacity of volleyball athlete. Various training methods are used to improve these capacity. Smaller stature is not an innate disadvantage that forms inequality. It can be made up by robust training. Our national team is still capable of obtaining distinctive result and returning to international arena. This study has tested common serve reception footwork (stride step, split step, shuffle step). Athletes from National Taiwan Normal University Women’s Volleyball Team has participated in this studies (mean height 172 ± 4 cm, mean weight 63 ± 5.7 kg, mean age 20 ± 4.76 years, mean experience 8 ± 2.88 years). The participants were evenly distributed with Stratified Sampling into two group: fitLight Trainer™ training group and conventional agility training group. Both groups were trained every Monday, Wednesday and Friday for 90 minutes each day for 6 weeks. fitLight Trainer™ training group was trained with fitLight Trainer™ while the conventional agility training group was trained with conventional agility training protocol. The strength and conditioning training incorporated in this study included jumping, strength and coordination training. The objective of the training was to acquired correct movement as demonstrated as soon as possible. Test on reaction time was carried out after 6 weeks of training as post-test. Descriptive statistics such as mean, standard deviation were presented. The results obtained were analyzed with One-way ANCOVA to test if reaction time of movement initiation between both groups as well as between pre- and post-test has reached significant level. The results were reported as below:
1. After 6 weeks of training with fitLight Trainer™, reaction time of shuffle step has reached significant level. Although the for stride step and split step have not reached significant level, the mean reaction times have both notably improved.
2. Conventional agility training did not improve the reaction time of stride step, split step and shuffle step.
3. Comparing the fitLight Trainer™ training group (experiment group) and the conventional agility training group (control group), the experiment group was significantly more effective than the control group.

並列關鍵字

Reaction time ； fitLight Trainer™ ； conventional agility training

參考文獻

中文文獻

1. 王保奎. (2005). 排球运动中移动能力的理论分析及训练方法. 贛南師範學院學報, 26(6), 93-94.

2. 王衍超. (2009). 不同層級排球選手接發球準確性, 啟動時間, 動作時間之探討. 臺灣師範大學運動科學研究所學位論文, 1-53.

3. 何金山. (2011). 低欄架敏捷性訓練對排球選手左右移位之訓練分析. 嘉大體育健康休閒期刊, 10(2), 217-225.

4. 李俊毅. (2010). 下肢增強式訓練對劍道攻擊速度及反應時間的影響, 未出版碩士論文. 中國文化大學, 臺北市.